Treatment of Male Infertility 1982
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-68223-0_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunological Infertility in Men: Clinical and Therapeutic Considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another indicator mechanism of sexual selection (Andersson and Simmons 2006), the "immunocompetence handicap hypothesis" (Folstad and Karter 1992), suggests that the immune system competes for resources with sexually selected ornaments, and that variation in ornamental display reflects variation in immunocompetence. Yet, immune activity may also be related to ejaculate quality because sperm cells are perceived as "non-self" by the immune system and are exposed to immunological attacks in the testes and epididymis (Friberg 1982;Hogarth 1982;Roitt et al 1993). This attack, which may reduce male fertility (Skau and Folstad 2005), is often manifested as high levels of immunoglobulins (Ig) on sperm cell surfaces (Chamley and Clarke 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another indicator mechanism of sexual selection (Andersson and Simmons 2006), the "immunocompetence handicap hypothesis" (Folstad and Karter 1992), suggests that the immune system competes for resources with sexually selected ornaments, and that variation in ornamental display reflects variation in immunocompetence. Yet, immune activity may also be related to ejaculate quality because sperm cells are perceived as "non-self" by the immune system and are exposed to immunological attacks in the testes and epididymis (Friberg 1982;Hogarth 1982;Roitt et al 1993). This attack, which may reduce male fertility (Skau and Folstad 2005), is often manifested as high levels of immunoglobulins (Ig) on sperm cell surfaces (Chamley and Clarke 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this scenario, males must undergo immune suppression during sperm production because sperm cells are non-self to the diploid organism, and thus they are targets of immunological attack in the male reproductive tract (Friberg 1982;Hogarth 1982;Roitt et al 1993). Ejaculate quality will therefore be a¡ected by a male's ability to downregulate his immune responses, a process potentially regulated by immunosuppressive androgens (Wyle & Kent 1977;Grossman 1984;Grossman & Roselle 1986;Folstad & Karter 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Females are known to select the most ornamented males (Andersson 1994), and it has recently been suggested that when mating with the most ornamented male, a female may acquire both a high probability of fertilization and heritable parasite resistance for her o¡spring (Folstad & Skarstein 1995Hillgarth et al 1997). According to this scenario, males must undergo immune suppression during sperm production because sperm cells are non-self to the diploid organism, and thus they are targets of immunological attack in the male reproductive tract (Friberg 1982;Hogarth 1982;Roitt et al 1993). Ejaculate quality will therefore be a¡ected by a male's ability to downregulate his immune responses, a process potentially regulated by immunosuppressive androgens (Wyle & Kent 1977;Grossman 1984;Grossman & Roselle 1986;Folstad & Karter 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%