1963
DOI: 10.21236/ad0435722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunological and Toxic Differences Between Mouse-Virulent and Mouse-Avirulent Candida Albicans

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

1964
1964
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the substance that was finally isolated either was not highly active or the active principle was not present in a sufficiently high concentration, because milligram quantities were necessary to induce fever in comparison with the submicrogram amounts of bacterial endotoxin which are capable of inducing such a response. Recently, Isenberg, Allerhand, and Berkman (1963a) and Isenberg et al (1963b) reported the phenol extraction of a toxic substance from C. albicans, very likely the same as that isolated in the present studies since it had endotoxin-like properties, viz., mouse lethality and the ability to cause dermal necrosis. It is tempting to characterize the toxic nature of Candida as endotoxic, inasmuch as other investigators have extracted materials which were dermonecrotic (Maibach and Kligman, 1962), lethal in mice (Dobias, 1957), and poorly antigenic (Isenberg et al, 1963a).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Furthermore, the substance that was finally isolated either was not highly active or the active principle was not present in a sufficiently high concentration, because milligram quantities were necessary to induce fever in comparison with the submicrogram amounts of bacterial endotoxin which are capable of inducing such a response. Recently, Isenberg, Allerhand, and Berkman (1963a) and Isenberg et al (1963b) reported the phenol extraction of a toxic substance from C. albicans, very likely the same as that isolated in the present studies since it had endotoxin-like properties, viz., mouse lethality and the ability to cause dermal necrosis. It is tempting to characterize the toxic nature of Candida as endotoxic, inasmuch as other investigators have extracted materials which were dermonecrotic (Maibach and Kligman, 1962), lethal in mice (Dobias, 1957), and poorly antigenic (Isenberg et al, 1963a).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…More recently, phenol extraction of Candida cells resulted in a fraction which was lethal to mice upon injection (17,18). However, the data in our report indicating that nonviable C. albicans cells were unable to produce either tissue pathology or elevated serum levels of BUN and creatine phosphokinase suggest that factors other than heat-stable cell wall components of the organism were responsible for these effects.…”
Section: Tabif 3 Evaluation Of Cardiac Injury 12 H After Intravenoucontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Mankowski (1975) reports that mucin definitely increases the host susceptibility when injected intraperitoneally together with C. albicans. A similar enhancement has been established by treating experimental animals with corticosteroids [Seligmann (1953), Roth et al (1957), Louria et al (1960), l. Although under such altered conditions even avirulent yeast species may eventually kill the compromised test animals (Isenberg et al, 1963), a great part of cortisone-treated mice survived.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This should be exemplified briefly: C. albicans induces in mice, rats and guinea-pigs a generalized infection provided that the organisms are administered parenterally and in amounts of lo6 to lo9 living cells; but even then death does not regularly occur (Hasenclever and Mitchell (1961), Isenberg et al (1963), Oblack et al (1978). Extreme variations of the results are explained by strain dlfferences among the same species [Isenberg et al (1963), Albano and Schmitt (1973)l.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%