2002
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.76.15.7713-7723.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunogenicity and Safety of Defective Vaccinia Virus Lister: Comparison with Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The viral attenuation by expression of IFN-␤ without cost to vaccine immunogenicity suggests that such vaccines can be used as alternatives to the currently available smallpox vaccine. Several studies have been conducted to test the ability of using rVV such as modified VV Ankara as a safer smallpox vaccine that can induce an effective immune response without replication of the VV (51,52). Similar to our characterization of HA-VV-IFN-␤, modified VV Ankara is highly attenuated and yet it induces a robust immune response upon vaccination that can protect against challenge by virulent poxviruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The viral attenuation by expression of IFN-␤ without cost to vaccine immunogenicity suggests that such vaccines can be used as alternatives to the currently available smallpox vaccine. Several studies have been conducted to test the ability of using rVV such as modified VV Ankara as a safer smallpox vaccine that can induce an effective immune response without replication of the VV (51,52). Similar to our characterization of HA-VV-IFN-␤, modified VV Ankara is highly attenuated and yet it induces a robust immune response upon vaccination that can protect against challenge by virulent poxviruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Recently, several groups have reevaluated the available vaccinia strains, including the replication-defective MVA, in a search for safer smallpox vaccines (37)(38)(39)(40). Although 10 9 pfu of MVA was shown to be safe in monkeys (41), a large quantity of virus, 10 8 pfu, an amount that is 1,000-fold more than a conventional vaccination dosage, was necessary to induce protective immunity (40).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) This vaccination regimen consisted of DNA and a nonreplicating vaccinia virus DIs, which is very safe even in immunodeficient states. Although other highly attenuated vaccinia strains replicate under synchronized viral infections to mammalian cells (37,38), the DIs does not replicate in any mammalian cells tested because of natural big deletion of the genome (22, 23, 39). Thus, DIs vaccination eliminates the risk of a disseminated or progressive vaccinia viral infection in the immunocompromised, HIVinfected individual.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The currently widely used MVA, which was developed toward the end of the campaign to eradicate small pox, has been effectively and safely used in Ͼ100,000 people as a small pox vaccine (19). MVA-based recombinant vector has also been reported to be safe in animals (20,21). Lately, we have developed a replication-defective vaccinia virus DIs strain as a vaccine vector (22,23).…”
Section: Induction Of Positive Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses mentioning
confidence: 99%