2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2008.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune response affects ant trophallactic behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
19
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a similar induction of trophallactic exchanges was reported in Camponotus fellah [13], no connection between trophallaxis and the social spread of disease resistance was tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although a similar induction of trophallactic exchanges was reported in Camponotus fellah [13], no connection between trophallaxis and the social spread of disease resistance was tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For behavioural, antimicrobial and protein analyses, median workers were randomly divided into four treatments: (i) naive: cold-immobilized only; (ii) Ringer: injected with sterile Ringer solution; (iii) immunized: injected with 10 8 cells ml 21 of heat-killed S. marcescens; and (iv) LPS: injected with 5 mg ml 21 of LPS in sterile Ringer. Workers were injected with 0.5 ml according to treatment as described by de Souza et al [13]. Ants used for behavioural observations were immediately isolated, while ants used for antimicrobial activity and protein analyses were placed in respective treatment groups of 30.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectral signature of the implants was measured using ImageJ software,National Institutes of Health, USA [31]. The mean absorbance value was adopted as a measure of the rate of encapsulation with values from zero to 255.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been multiple reports of either increases [44,45] or decreases [43,59 ,70] in the frequency of trophallaxis involving pathogen-exposed or immunestimulated workers (but see [71]). In honeybees, Nosema-infected workers both increase their food intake and decrease their willingness to share food with nestmates [70].…”
Section: Modulation Of Social Contactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was hypothesised that this may help contain disease by decreasing pathogen transmission risk from infected to healthy workers. Moreover, grooming of treated workers has been consistently reported to increase following pathogen exposure or immune stimulation in ants, termites and honeybees [43,46,47 ,59 ,71-75] (but see [44]). Although grooming reduces the infection risk of pathogen-exposed individuals via mechanical removal of infectious particles from their body surface [72,75], sometimes combined with chemical disinfection [76], it also increases the risk of pathogen transmission to the grooming individuals [71,72].…”
Section: Modulation Of Social Contactsmentioning
confidence: 99%