1995
DOI: 10.1112/jlms/51.1.189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immobilization of Solids and Mondriga Quadratic Forms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof follows the geometric ideas developed in Lemma 1, which were first introduced in [1]. For i = 1, 2, 3, let…”
Section: # 0 Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proof follows the geometric ideas developed in Lemma 1, which were first introduced in [1]. For i = 1, 2, 3, let…”
Section: # 0 Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a C ~ pointed curve (a, X), n _> 1, consider the set (1) defined in a neighborhood of the identity in g (or of the origin in ~3). We prove that S is a surface of class C '~.…”
Section: Siidingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In dimension three, immobilization results are much more complicated. See [2]. To characterize when four points in the faces of a tetrahedron T immobilize T we require the following definition.…”
Section: The Relation With Immobilization Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of Theorem 4 now follows straightforward from the proof or Theorem 3 in [2], but this time we consider, instead of a rigid triangle sliding along three fixed planes, the dual situation of a 3-dimensional rigid sector (the angle between three planes H a , H b and H c ) sliding along three fixed points a, b, c.…”
Section: The Relation With Immobilization Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%