2008
DOI: 10.1002/bit.21990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immobilization of cellulose fibrils on solid substrates for cellulase‐binding studies through quantitative fluorescence microscopy

Abstract: Cellulases, enzymes capable of depolymerizing cellulose polymers into fermentable sugars, are essential components in the production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic materials. Given the importance of these enzymes to the evolving biofuel industry considerable research effort is focused on understanding the interaction between cellulases and cellulose fibrils. This manuscript presents a method that addresses challenges that must be overcome in order to study such interactions through high-resolution fluoresc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(54 reference statements)
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, extracted k 1 values for experiments done at higher enzyme concentration solutions are larger, since a smaller fraction of enzyme was lost to non-specific adsorption. Furthermore, the binding rates at the highest concentrations we measured, are similar to results obtained in previous studies with BMCC, whose bindings sites are easily accessible (Moran-Mirabal et al 2008). Nevertheless, given the large variations seen in these data, only order-of-magnitude estimation can be Fig.…”
Section: Estimation Of Kinetic Constantssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, extracted k 1 values for experiments done at higher enzyme concentration solutions are larger, since a smaller fraction of enzyme was lost to non-specific adsorption. Furthermore, the binding rates at the highest concentrations we measured, are similar to results obtained in previous studies with BMCC, whose bindings sites are easily accessible (Moran-Mirabal et al 2008). Nevertheless, given the large variations seen in these data, only order-of-magnitude estimation can be Fig.…”
Section: Estimation Of Kinetic Constantssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Thus, any effort to resolve cellulase binding, mobility and synergistic interactions must provide nano-scale resolution of the behavior of these interesting molecular machines. Recently, fluorescence microscopy was used to observe temporal cellulase binding to micro-patterned BMCC substrate (Moran-Mirabal et al 2008). In the present study of cellulase binding to pretreated wood particles, time-lapse CLSM was used to explore the adsorption of three T. fusca cellulases to lignocellulose substrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When combined with high-resolution fluorescence microscopy techniques, biomolecules can be manipulated with nanoscale precision using these patterned surfaces, potentially elucidating the inner workings of cells and shedding new light on biophysical processes. In a study by Moran-Mirabal and coworkers, the binding and activity of cellulases have been quantified by fluorescence microscopy of Alexa Fluor 647 labeled cellulases moving along Alexa Fluor 488 labeled cellulose fibrils [65]. These fibrils were immobilised onto glass coverslips using parylene “peel-off” stencils.…”
Section: Micropatterning Using Parylene “Peel-off” Stencilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout this project we have endeavored to develop methods for the comprehensive study of the binding and diffusion behavior of cellulases on cellulose fibrils, bundles, and mats. Method development focused on immobilization of cellulose onto solid support [3], managing photo-bleaching of fluorphores [4], and developing tracking software for measuring and analyzing the surface diffusion on insoluble cellulose [5]. Our approach has been to use these methods to explore hypotheses regarding cellulases surface diffusion and binding along the cellulose fibrils.…”
Section: Task B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%