2019
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immersive Surgical Anatomy of the Frontotemporal-Orbitozygomatic Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the overarching factors informing approach selection, a number of variations and nuances have been described for each craniotomy that may vary based on patient and surgeon preferences, among other factors. The orbitozygomatic craniotomy has been described in 1-, 2-, and 3-piece variations, as well as at least 2 different "modified orbitozygomatic" techniques [4,6,7,9]. Ultimately, data is limited regarding the relative risks and benefits of these approaches; however, in our experience, we have relied on the standard 2-piece technique described above and the 3-piece technique to balance the needs of efficiency and safety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to the overarching factors informing approach selection, a number of variations and nuances have been described for each craniotomy that may vary based on patient and surgeon preferences, among other factors. The orbitozygomatic craniotomy has been described in 1-, 2-, and 3-piece variations, as well as at least 2 different "modified orbitozygomatic" techniques [4,6,7,9]. Ultimately, data is limited regarding the relative risks and benefits of these approaches; however, in our experience, we have relied on the standard 2-piece technique described above and the 3-piece technique to balance the needs of efficiency and safety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orbitozygomatic craniotomy has been described in one-, two-, and three-piece variations, as well as at least two different "modified orbitozygomatic" techniques. 4,6,7,9 Ultimately, data are limited regarding the relative risks and benefits of these approaches; however, in our experience, we have relied on the standard two-piece technique described above and the three-piece technique to balance the needs of efficiency and safety. Similarly, although we prefer the craniotome, the osteotomies may also be completed with a reciprocating saw, which is a less protected instrument, but one that provides narrower cuts that may be associated with more favorable cosmesis and healing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Immersive anatomy experiences of cranial approaches developed with photogrammetry have been reported by Rodriguez Rubio et al and others. [24][25][26][27] Similarly, Qlone, an app that performs 360°photogrammetry using mobile devices, has been used to create macroscopic and sectional 3D models of the brain and brainstem. 7,28 However, a caveat of photogrammetry is that it is difficult to create 3D models that accurately represent a microsurgical perspective.…”
Section: Photogrammetry: Traditional Vs Our Novel Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%