Immediate implant placement in molar regions: a 12‐month prospective, randomized follow‐up study

Abstract

After 12 months of loading, no significant differences in peri-implant bone level were observed after the use of three bone regenerative techniques in connection with immediately placed implants in molar regions.

Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…Survival was defined as implants remaining in situ at the follow-up examinations, irrespective of their conditions. All 20 studies reported survival rates, leading to a weighted mean survival rate of 96.6% with 95% CI (93.5-99.7) [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Certain considerations must be taken into account when interpreting the estimates of the individual studies: the study by Atieh et al shows a greater standard deviation, due to the small sample size, only 12 implants [13].…”

“…The studies included in this systematic review that analyzed survival and success rates as well as MBL depending on the type of implant-abutment connection [13,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] reported no statistically significant for implant survival rate (p = 0.511) success rate (p = 0.463) and MBL (p = 0.393) around implants with internal or external connections.…”

“…Out of the 20 included investigations for this analysis, 16 studies used grafting materials [14, 16-20, 23, 24, 26-32] and 4 did not perform any grafting [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Implant survival was 92.2% with 95% CI (85.1-99.2) for studies that did not graft the gap, while studies that grafted the gap presented with 97.7% with 95% CI (94.3-100).…”

“…Analyzed implants were divided into two groups: < 5 mm [15,19,22,26,27,29] [13,21,23], without statistical significant difference (p = 0.205).…”

Novel Implant Design Improves Implant Survival in Multirooted Extraction Sites: A Preclinical Pilot Study

“…In agreement with the present findings, Liñares et al, 21 in a similar model that lacked augmentation procedures, found a relatively high degree of bone loss around immediate implants, ranging from 2.5 to 2.6 mm from implant shoulder to bone crest and 3.2 to 2.8 mm from implant shoulder to first BIC. On the contrary, radiographic bone loss of a much lesser extent (1.1 mm on average) was reported by Urban et al, 22,23 who compared different augmentation techniques in conjunction with immediate implantations in molar extraction sites.…”