2002
DOI: 10.3758/bf03192836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imitative learning in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) using the bidirectional control procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, quail can imitate conspecifics to solve a novel foraging problem [13] and recognize conspecifics on video [14].…”
Section: Materials and Methods (A) Model Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, quail can imitate conspecifics to solve a novel foraging problem [13] and recognize conspecifics on video [14].…”
Section: Materials and Methods (A) Model Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparatus used in the present experiment (see Figure 1) combined features from the apparatus used in similar imitative learning studies involving Japanese quail (Akins et al, 2002;Akins & Zentall, 1996). It consisted of two large modular chambers (Colbourn Instruments, Model H10-11R-TC, Lehigh Valley, PA) placed side by side.…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later research, however, suggested that the direction that observers pushed the pole may have been influenced by odor cues left by the demonstrators on the side of the pole that they pushed, rather than by the visual observation of the demonstrators (Mitchell, Heyes, Gardner, & Dawson 1999). Akins, Klein, and Zentall (2002) modified this procedure to test for imitation in Japanese quail, a species less likely to be influenced by odor cues. In their design, observer quail viewed a demonstrator push a feeder-blocking screen to the left or right of a feeder opening.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In two, the task proved inappropriate for demonstrating social learning in the first place (rats, Heyes et al 1994, Mitchell et al 1999chimpanzees, Tennie et al 2006). Of the remaining five non-human studies, four have generated negative results in the emulation condition ( Japanese quail, Akins et al 2002;starlings, Fawcett et al 2002;rhesus macaques, Subiaul et al 2004;chimpanzees, Hopper et al 2007). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%