2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12098-020-03209-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging Modalities in Congenital Heart Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other downsides are the higher cost, limited availability, and image degrading artefacts due to implanted stents and coils. 7 , 8 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other downsides are the higher cost, limited availability, and image degrading artefacts due to implanted stents and coils. 7 , 8 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advancement in the technology of the devices and the increase in the experience of the physicians in transthoracic echocardiography examination, diagnostic angiography is no longer needed in the diagnosis of many CHDs. Computed tomography angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance examination also play a role in reducing this need (29). However, conventional diagnostic angiography is still needed, especially in the surgical decision-making of patients with leftright shunts or in the identification of complex cardiac pathologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no doubt three-dimensional printed models and the increasing use of augmented and virtual reality can be extremely useful for education, procedural simulation and planning [ 12 , 43 , 44 , 45 ]. However, in our experience, utilizing the endocast and virtual dissection images on a monitor is often the most optimal strategy in clinical practice to provide a detailed evaluation of three-dimensional cardiac anatomy to support transcatheter and surgical planning while balancing costs and time efficiency [ 4 , 11 , 12 , 16 , 50 , 51 ]. Three-dimensional images in this paper were reconstructed using commercially available software/workstation (Horos, Pixmeo, Geneva, Switzerland; Ziostation2; Ziosoft, Tokyo, Japan; 3D Builder, Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA).…”
Section: Advanced Application Of the Three-dimensional Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%