2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2011.6116371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image complexity measure based on visual attention

Abstract: Digital images can be analyzed at wide range of levels going from pixel arrangement to semantics. As a consequence, finding a visual complexity estimator is a difficult task. In this article we propose a definition of attention based perceptual complexity. We study the performance of human eye movements and of different models of computational attention against a ground-truth of image complexity based on the observation time of an image description task. The results obtained show that besides its lack of seman… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To adjust low level image features, we used the SHINE-Toolbox for MATLAB (Willenbockel et al, 2010). Image complexity was measured by employing a method based on the compression rate of previously generated saliency maps (Da Silva, Courboulay, & Estraillier, 2011). We generated "Itti-Koch-Niebur saliency maps" for each image (Itti, Koch, & Niebur, 1998) by using the graph-based visual saliency (GBVS) algorithm (Harel, Koch, & Perona, 2007).…”
Section: Apparatus and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To adjust low level image features, we used the SHINE-Toolbox for MATLAB (Willenbockel et al, 2010). Image complexity was measured by employing a method based on the compression rate of previously generated saliency maps (Da Silva, Courboulay, & Estraillier, 2011). We generated "Itti-Koch-Niebur saliency maps" for each image (Itti, Koch, & Niebur, 1998) by using the graph-based visual saliency (GBVS) algorithm (Harel, Koch, & Perona, 2007).…”
Section: Apparatus and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, inFigures 2-3, the fixations were clustered in the embedded shape indicating the correct response(Nisiforou & Laghos, 2012). Since the perception of complexity is correlated with the variety in the visual stimulus, visual model may also look complicated if its parts are difficult to identify and separate from each other (DaSilva, Courboulay, & Estraillier, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Dillon and Watson (1996) recommendations, psychological measures of individual differences are in need to raise potentials for the generalization of HCI outcomes. Since the perception of complexity is correlated with the variety in the visual stimulus a visual pattern may also look complex if its parts are difficult to identify and separate from each other (DaSilva et al, 2011). Therefore, cognitive psychological theories and methods should be further applied to human-computer interaction to interpret users' individual needs and cognitive traits.…”
Section: User Cognitive Characteristics Visual Complexity and Human-mentioning
confidence: 99%