2022
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(22)00480-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Il-1beta Signal Inhibition in acute alcoholic hepatitis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of canakinumab therapy (ISAIAH)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…96 In a recent multicenter placebo controlled clinical trial on 57 patients with biopsy proven AH (mDF ≥ 32 and MELD ≤ 27), canakinumab ( N = 28) improved liver histology (58.3 vs. 41.7%, p = 0.025), but failed to improve 28-day patient survival (93% in each group). 97 There were no drug-related safety concerns in this study.…”
Section: Management Of Liver Diseasementioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…96 In a recent multicenter placebo controlled clinical trial on 57 patients with biopsy proven AH (mDF ≥ 32 and MELD ≤ 27), canakinumab ( N = 28) improved liver histology (58.3 vs. 41.7%, p = 0.025), but failed to improve 28-day patient survival (93% in each group). 97 There were no drug-related safety concerns in this study.…”
Section: Management Of Liver Diseasementioning
confidence: 80%
“…32 and MELD 27), canakinumab (N ¼ 28) improved liver histology (58.3 vs. 41.7%, p ¼ 0.025), but failed to improve 28-day patient survival (93% in each group). 97 There were no drug-related safety concerns in this study.…”
Section: Drugs Targeting Hepatic Inflammationmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…36 Twenty-nine patients were enrolled to canakinumab group and 28 to placebo group. 37 The primary endpoint was histologic improvement at 28 days compared to baseline, which was not significantly different between the two groups (58.3% in canakinumab vs 41.7% in placebo, P = 0.248). The rate of infection as a serious adverse event was not significantly different between the two groups (1% in canakinumab vs 17% in placebo, P = 0.380).…”
Section: ) Hepatic Inflammationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Canakinumab, which is a monoclonal antibody specifically targeting IL‐1β, has been used in a multicenter, double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial in patients with alcoholic hepatitis (DF ≥ 32, but MELD ≤ 27) as an inhibitor of IL‐1 signal 36 . Twenty‐nine patients were enrolled to canakinumab group and 28 to placebo group 37 . The primary endpoint was histologic improvement at 28 days compared to baseline, which was not significantly different between the two groups (58.3% in canakinumab vs 41.7% in placebo, P = 0.248).…”
Section: Current Treatment Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no generally accepted pathophysiological concept, and it seems likely that the mechanisms leading to ACLF are highly individual, depending on the underlying liver disease, on the ACLF trigger but also on the type of organ system involvement ( 5 - 8 ). The fact that several attempts to establish ACLF disease modifying therapies such as granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) ( 9 ), the unselective interleukin-1 (IL-1) inhibitor Anakinra ( 10 ), or selective IL-1beta inhibitor canakinumab ( 11 ) failed in clinical studies clearly emphasizes that the complexity of the underlying pathomechanisms of this disease is still not well understood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%