Identifying strategies to maximise recruitment and retention of practices and patients in a multicentre randomised controlled trial of an intervention to optimise secondary prevention for coronary heart disease in primary care

Abstract

BackgroundRecruitment and retention of patients and healthcare providers in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is important in order to determine the effectiveness of interventions. However, failure to achieve recruitment targets is common and reasons why a particular recruitment strategy works for one study and not another remain unclear. We sought to describe a strategy used in a multicentre RCT in primary care, to report researchers' and participants' experiences of its implementation and to inform future strategies to maximise recruitment and retention.MethodsIn total 48 general practices and 903 patients were recruited from three different areas of Ireland to a RCT of an intervention designed to optimise secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. The recruitment process involved telephoning practices, posting information, visiting practices, identifying potential participants, posting invitations and obtaining consent. Retention involved patients attending reviews and responding to questionnaires and practices facilitating data collection.ResultsWe achieved high retention rates for practices (100%) and for patients (85%) over an 18-month intervention period. Pilot work, knowledge of the setting, awareness of change in staff and organisation amongst participant sites, rapid responses to queries and acknowledgement of practitioners' contributions were identified as being important. Minor variations in protocol and research support helped to meet varied, complex and changing individual needs of practitioners and patients and encouraged retention in the trial. A collaborative relationship between researcher and practice staff which required time to develop was perceived as vital for both recruitment and retention.ConclusionRecruiting and retaining the numbers of practices and patients estimated as required to provide findings with adequate power contributes to increased confidence in the validity and generalisability of RCT results. A continuous dynamic process of monitoring progress within trials and tailoring strategies to particular circumstances, whilst not compromising trial protocols, should allow maximal recruitment and retention.Trial registrationISRCTN24081411

Use of strategies to improve retention in primary care randomised trials: a qualitative study with in-depth interviews

“…Research on strategies to improve retention of participants in primary care trials is limited and commonly grouped with recruitment strategies 14 15. Trial retention is important because loss to follow-up can lead to incomplete data for the primary outcome, bias results and impact the generalisability of trial findings.…”

Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials

“…Arm a: carbamazepine vs. gabapentin vs. lamotrigine vs. oxcarbazepine vs. topiramate. Arm b: valproate vs. lamotrigine (LTG) vs. vs topiramate (TPM) Marson 2007 (2)UK hospital outpatient departmentsMarson 2007†Back painAdults with low back pain aged 18-65 years in a trial comparing exercise manipulation vs. exercise plus manipulation UK BEAM 2004UK primary careLetley 2000‡Back painAdults aged 18-65 years in a trial comparing yoga vs. usual care Tilbrook 2011UK primary careMan 2011ScreeningProstate, lung, ovarian, colorectal cancerAdults aged 55-74 years in PLCO trial comparing PSA and CA125 at baseline, and annually for 5 years. Digital rectal examination, transvaginal ultrasound and chest x-ray at baseline and 5 years vs. usual follow-up Prorok 2000USA trial sitesSubar 2001, Ford 2006 (African American men aged ≥ 55 years only from PLCO)CervicalWomen with low-grade abnormal cervical smear aged 20-59 years in the TOMBOLA trial: Colposcopy vs. 6-monthly smears TOMBOLA 2009a TOMBOLA 2009bUKSharp 2006a-hPostnatal depressionWomen childbearing aged = 18 years < 2 weeks' postpartum at high risk of postnatal depression in a trial comparing proactive individualised telephone-based peer support vs. standard postpartum care Dennis 2009Canada communityKenton 2007a-dPreventionFracture...…”

A Systematic Process for Recruiting Physician-Patient Dyads in Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs)

“…The value of an informed approach to patient recruitment cannot be underestimated. 34,54 Lower Burden for Practice Staff Considering workload in primary care practices, physicians and practice staff should carry the lowest possible burden throughout the recruitment process. In our study, the use of RAs was the key factor in reducing this burden.…”

“…With 90% of all patient contacts occurring in primary care, 33 PBRNs offer access to a large number of patients with a wide variety of clinical conditions. 34 Physician and patient recruitment in PBRNs can be improved using "champions," who make initial contacts and establish a relationship with clinic staff. 10 However, despite a large pool of potential recruits and apparent ease of access, clinician participation rates vary greatly and may threaten the representativeness of findings.…”