Identifying drunkenness in the night‐time economy

Perham, Nick; Moore, Simon; Shepherd, Jonathan Paul; Cusens, Bryany

doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01699.x

Cited by 37 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Such sampling biases can seriously distort inferences and should be taken into account (e.g. Heckman, 1979;Perham et al, 2007). Doing so, however, increases research costs, through requiring additional information collection, and neccessitates assessment of inter-rater reliability.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

The effect of rugby match outcome on spectator aggression and intention to drink alcohol

Moore

Shepherd

Eden

et al. 2007

Criminal Behav Ment Health

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

The effect of rugby match outcome on spectator aggression and intention to drink alcohol

Moore

Shepherd

Eden

et al. 2007

Criminal Behav Ment Health

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, the specific behaviors portrayed by pseudopatrons could impact the likelihood of recognition, and we used behaviors such as clumsiness, slurred speech, and carelessness with money that have been identified in previous research as indicative of intoxication (e.g. Burns, Nusbaumer, & Reiling, 2003;Perham, Moore, Shepherd, & Cusens, 2007;Rosenberg & Alexander, 2000).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of behavioral signs of intoxication on bartender service

Goodsite

Klear

Rosenberg

2008

Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The present study was designed to assess whether the serving practices of a sample of bartenders in an American university town would vary as a function of the number of behavioral cues of intoxication displayed by apparently real patrons (who were actually experimental confederates). Method: We trained two male and three female confederates to role-play three different conditions (three ambiguous signs, eight apparently obvious signs, or no signs of intoxication) and assessed whether they would be served a second beer after 'accidentally' knocking over a first beer. Results: Service of another beer was denied in only 10% of episodes when a confederate displayed no signs or three signs indicative of intoxication; however, confederates were denied service during 50% of episodes when multiple, obvious signs were displayed. Furthermore, neither the type of the establishment, gender of the bartender or gender of the confederate was associated with likelihood of being served the second drink. Conclusion: Although some bartenders are attentive to multiple behavioral signs of intoxication, we recommend additional research on the most effective combinations of server training and legal measures to reduce further the proportion of intoxicated customers served alcohol, both for their own benefit and the public health.University student drinkers have a range of legal and illegal options for acquiring alcoholic beverages, including service from public bars and licensed restaurants. Several investigators have provided demonstrations that server intervention

show abstract

“…Intervention requires detection: Perham et al 24 give some data, collected in Cardiff, on the relationship between BAC and the probabilities of three behavioural indicators of drunkenness (staggering gait, glazed eyes, and slurred speech): a probability of 0.50 of having a staggering gait occurred at a BAC of 0.186, for example.…”

Section: Licensed Premisesmentioning

confidence: 99%