2021
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28010049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Best Implementation Practices for Smoking Cessation in Complex Cancer Settings

Abstract: Background: In response to evidence about the health benefits of smoking cessation at time of cancer diagnosis, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) (OH-CCO) instructed Regional Cancer Centres (RCC) to implement smoking cessation interventions (SCI). RCCs were given flexibility to implement SCIs according to their context but were required to screen new patients for tobacco status, advise patients about the importance of quitting, and refer patients to cessation supports. The purpose of this evaluation was to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the framework provides a standard to follow, each RCC implements it in their own unique way. This has led to several natural experiments and an attempt to identify best implementation practices for smoking cessation in cancer care settings [ 8 ]. For example, in 2017, the London Regional Cancer Program launched a pilot to provide free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to improve the low referral rates identified in an evaluation of their smoking cessation program [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the framework provides a standard to follow, each RCC implements it in their own unique way. This has led to several natural experiments and an attempt to identify best implementation practices for smoking cessation in cancer care settings [ 8 ]. For example, in 2017, the London Regional Cancer Program launched a pilot to provide free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to improve the low referral rates identified in an evaluation of their smoking cessation program [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%