1995
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<0225:iovpor>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Vertical Profiles of Radar Reflectivity for Hydrological Applications Using an Inverse Method. Part I: Formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
84
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…He found the Gaussian approximation for more complicated beam patterns varies by less than 0.64 dB in comparison in most cases. Other investigators have also shown the Gaussian beam pattern is a good approximation for most meteorological applications (Donaldson 1964;Bogush 1989;Andrieu and Creutin 1995).…”
Section: Radar Beam Propagation Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…He found the Gaussian approximation for more complicated beam patterns varies by less than 0.64 dB in comparison in most cases. Other investigators have also shown the Gaussian beam pattern is a good approximation for most meteorological applications (Donaldson 1964;Bogush 1989;Andrieu and Creutin 1995).…”
Section: Radar Beam Propagation Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…An idealized vertical profile of reflectivity in convective-type rains has been suggested in a number of studies (e.g., Andrieu and Creutin 1995;Smyth and Illingworth 1997). These studies indicate that there is a general decrease of reflectivity with height AGL with an average gradient of b ϭ 2 dB km Ϫ1 or so such as…”
Section: Prospects For the Use Of Vertical Profiles Of Nonattenuated mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variability in the nonattenuated reflectivities is expected to be minimal in stratiform rain events, which are characterized by relatively modest rainfall rates (typically less than about 15 mm h Ϫ1 ), relatively strong radar bright bands, extensive spatial coverage, and long duration. Nonattenuated reflectivity profiles in stratiform rain are usually assumed to be constant (e.g., Andrieu and Creutin 1995). Assuming a typical 1-dB uncertainty in the nonattenuated K a -band reflectivity profiles for such events, the relative errors for the discussed method can be estimated as 40% for R ϭ 4 mm h Ϫ1 , 20% for R ϭ 10 mm h Ϫ1 , and 15% for R ϭ 15 mm h Ϫ1 (Matrosov 2005).…”
Section: Examples Of Retrievals Of Rainfall Rates At the Sgp Arm Cartmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the melting process in this layer, snowflakes and hail become coated with a film of water leading to the appearance of giant raindrops. The reflectivity in the bright band is generally 5-10 dB stronger than in the rain below or the snow directly above 17,[21][22][23][24] . The pseudoCAPPI reflectivity data at the altitudes below the freezing levels is therefore selected for further analysis to avoid the bright band effect that could cause radar rainfall overestimation.…”
Section: Radar Reflectivity Measurement Errorsmentioning
confidence: 97%