1980
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a109309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of ten chromosome deficiencies of cotton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were confirmed by their following study on QTL mapping for lint percentage and fiber quality traits (micronaire, uniformity, and fiber elongation) using an n 2 mutant derived population (Rong et al 2007). However, all these results were based on their conclusion that both fuzzless loci (N 1 and n 2 ) were on chromosome 12 of the tetraploid cotton genome; but N 1 and n 2 were originally regarded as a pair of homoeologous loci on the long arm of chromosomes 12 and 26 (Endrizzi and Ramsay 1980;Endrizzi et al 1984;Samora et al 1994). Instead of using the single fuzzless locus mutant developed mapping populations (Rong et al 2005(Rong et al , 2007Zhang et al 2005;Guo et al 2006;Wan et al 2007), the common female parent line of the two F 2 populations we developed combined at least two fuzzless loci (N 1 and n 2 , and probably n 3 ) (Turley and Kloth 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results were confirmed by their following study on QTL mapping for lint percentage and fiber quality traits (micronaire, uniformity, and fiber elongation) using an n 2 mutant derived population (Rong et al 2007). However, all these results were based on their conclusion that both fuzzless loci (N 1 and n 2 ) were on chromosome 12 of the tetraploid cotton genome; but N 1 and n 2 were originally regarded as a pair of homoeologous loci on the long arm of chromosomes 12 and 26 (Endrizzi and Ramsay 1980;Endrizzi et al 1984;Samora et al 1994). Instead of using the single fuzzless locus mutant developed mapping populations (Rong et al 2005(Rong et al , 2007Zhang et al 2005;Guo et al 2006;Wan et al 2007), the common female parent line of the two F 2 populations we developed combined at least two fuzzless loci (N 1 and n 2 , and probably n 3 ) (Turley and Kloth 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). These relationships becomes more intriguing when considering that N 1 and n 2 may be homoeologous loci on the homeologous chromosome 12 and 26 (Endrizzi and Ramsay 1980;Samora et al 1994). A recent genetic map, however, reports that the n 2 locus was not located on chromosome 26, but on chromosome 12 (Rong et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A genetic study of the MCU5 fiberless line suggested that its fiberless character is controlled by two to four loci (Nadarajan and Rangasamy, 1988), and based on the reported segregation of F 2 progeny, that the MCU5 line has either the n 2 or n 3 locus along with other loci (Turley and Kloth, 2008). It was speculated later that the inhibitor gene could be equivalent to the dominant N 2 gene, since naked seeds have a tufted phenotype (Du et al, 2001). It was speculated later that the inhibitor gene could be equivalent to the dominant N 2 gene, since naked seeds have a tufted phenotype (Du et al, 2001).…”
Section: Fiberless Mutantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The n 2 locus is homeologus to N 1 , and resides on chromosome D12 (chromosome 26) (Endrizzi andRamsay, 1980, Zhu et al, 2018). To prove this, Du et al (2001) made a variety of crosses using different mutant lines. Rather than N 1 or n 2 , Turley and Kloth (2002) proposed a third locus n 3 controlling fuzzless trait when studying the genetic control of the fuzzless trait in cotton lines 143 and 243.…”
Section: Fiberless Mutantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation