2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-020-03005-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of structures and mechanisms in a flow field by POD analysis for input data obtained from visualization and PIV

Abstract: This paper investigates the application of proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) for data obtained from visualizations. Using the POD method, the flow field behind one and two cylinders in a staggered configuration was analyzed. The data processed by this method were obtained from experimental measurements of flow fields using the particle image velocimetry (PIV) method and visualization. The dominant frequencies of the flow pattern from these data were compared using constant temperature anemometry (CTA) meas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is comparable to the flow structure velocity (≈ 235 µm.s −1 ) measured by manual tracking (Materials and Methods) [37]. A principle application of POD is the identification of coherent structures in flow [47][48][49][50], which is effectively demonstrated here in the case of active turbulence.…”
Section: Evolution Of Active Turbulence Structures In Externally Driv...supporting
confidence: 76%
“…This result is comparable to the flow structure velocity (≈ 235 µm.s −1 ) measured by manual tracking (Materials and Methods) [37]. A principle application of POD is the identification of coherent structures in flow [47][48][49][50], which is effectively demonstrated here in the case of active turbulence.…”
Section: Evolution Of Active Turbulence Structures In Externally Driv...supporting
confidence: 76%
“…This observation is confirmed by the comparison of accuracies of different level POD reconstructions summarized in Table 8: The reconstructed field could not be as accurate as CNN-DCNN until more than about 50 POD modes are retained, beyond this value, reconstruction is more accurate but the improvement is quite limited as the accuracy is already approaching 100%. Besides, it is worth pointing out that POD by itself is typically working with a dataset that is already available (for modal decomposition and identification [52,53]) rather than a prediction tool such as the proposed CNN-DCNN model, which after trained, is expected to directly provide flow field data that is not necessarily pre-existed. Consequently, as predicted flow fields correlate closely to the leading POD modes that contain almost the entire energy (eigenvalues) and dynamic information (eigen functions), it is reasonable to be optimistic in terms of the capability of the CNN-DCNN model to retain at least part of the intrinsic information of the flow dynamics.…”
Section: Relative Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although research on aero-optical effects has made some progress through experiments, research on their microscopic mechanism has stagnated [21][22][23]. At present, research on the mechanism of aero-optical effects mainly focuses on the change in the turbulent density field on the optical path.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%