2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.07.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of rigid body properties from vibration measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the boundary conditions given in Eqs. (2) and (3) are approximated by FD with a truncation error of order one Summarizing Eqs. (5) and (9)- (11) and denoting u n as in Fig.…”
Section: Approximation By Finite Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, the boundary conditions given in Eqs. (2) and (3) are approximated by FD with a truncation error of order one Summarizing Eqs. (5) and (9)- (11) and denoting u n as in Fig.…”
Section: Approximation By Finite Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rigid-body parameters (mass, center-of-gravity, inertia tensor) of a softly suspended flexible structure have been identified based on measured vibration data by a modal analysis approach in Ref. [2]. Various techniques to identify viscous damping parameters in linear dynamic models and to assess these methods in an experimental setting in terms of frequency-domain and spatial fit are investigated in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difficulty can be circumvented by using Frequency domain methods because it is possible to separate the rigid and the elastic system behaviour. The methods based on the Frequency domain are mainly divided into three groups: Inertia Restraint methods (IRM) [1,3], Methods of Direct Physical Parameter Identification [2] and the Modal methods (MM) [4,[11][12][13][14]. In this work, the authors focused their attention on the use of IRM or the so-called Mass Line methods (MLM) that are based on the principle that the dynamic response of structures in free-free conditions are characterized, in the low frequency region, by a constant term designated as inertial restraint or mass line.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods use frequency response functions and/or modal analysis to identify the inertia parameters, often together with the stiffness and damping characteristics of the mount elements [34] For spacecraft, rough estimation procedures of the inertia parameters based on onboard instrumentation can be implemented [5]. An algorithm proposed in [35] is based on the method of least squares and the method of conjugate gradients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%