2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of preterm birth based on RQA analysis of electrohysterograms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In classifying between preterm nonlabor (38 patients), preterm labor (13 patients), term nonlabor (59 patients), and term labor (75 patients) groups (using peak frequency of the power spectrum up to 1.0 Hz, burst duration, number of bursts per unit time, total burst activity, and artificial neural network), the reported percentages of correct classifications were 71%, 92%, 86%, and 79%, respectively [ 18 ]. A recent study on evaluating the applicability of the EHG records for the early detection and classification of preterm and term birth during pregnancy included 20 women between the 24th and 28th week of pregnancy with threatened preterm labor [ 56 ]. The women were divided into two groups: those delivering within seven days and those delivering after more than seven days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In classifying between preterm nonlabor (38 patients), preterm labor (13 patients), term nonlabor (59 patients), and term labor (75 patients) groups (using peak frequency of the power spectrum up to 1.0 Hz, burst duration, number of bursts per unit time, total burst activity, and artificial neural network), the reported percentages of correct classifications were 71%, 92%, 86%, and 79%, respectively [ 18 ]. A recent study on evaluating the applicability of the EHG records for the early detection and classification of preterm and term birth during pregnancy included 20 women between the 24th and 28th week of pregnancy with threatened preterm labor [ 56 ]. The women were divided into two groups: those delivering within seven days and those delivering after more than seven days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have focused on developing tools and algorithms for predicting labor and/or preterm labor using EHG with very promising results, achieving a predictive model accuracy of over 90% or even 95% [19][20][21][22][23][24][25], although none has had a significant impact on clinical practice, probably because the EHG recordings were conducted on women during regular clinical checkups under physiological conditions. In clinical practice, as tocolytic drugs are usually administered to inhibit uterine contractions at the first sign of threatened preterm labor, EHG recordings may be carried out during different tocolytic therapy phases and produce confusing results [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In classifying between preterm nonlabor (38 patients), preterm labor (13 922 patients), term nonlabor (59 patients), and term labor (75 patients) groups (using peak 923 frequency of the power spectrum up to 1.0 Hz, burst duration, number of bursts per 924 unit time, total burst activity, and artificial neural network), the reported percentages 925 of correct classifications were 71%, 92%, 86%, and 79%, respectively [18]. A recent 926 study on evaluating the applicability of the EHG records for the early detection and 927 classification of preterm and term birth during pregnancy included 20 women between 928 the 24th and 28th week of pregnancy with threatened preterm labor [56]. The women 929 were divided into two groups: those delivering within seven days and those delivering 930 after more than seven days.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%