1992
DOI: 10.1093/nar/20.4.699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of nucleotide preferences in DNA sequences recognised specifically by c-Ets-1 protein

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

7
83
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding Ets1 speci®city of binding to DNA, our EMSA results are in accordance with what was already known on the structure of the Ets1 binding site (Fisher et al, 1991;Ghysdael and Boureux, 1997;Woods et al, 1992). rEts1 bound to EBS2 and EBS4 but failed to bind to EBS1, EBS3 or EBS5, although they had the correct GGAA/T core sequence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding Ets1 speci®city of binding to DNA, our EMSA results are in accordance with what was already known on the structure of the Ets1 binding site (Fisher et al, 1991;Ghysdael and Boureux, 1997;Woods et al, 1992). rEts1 bound to EBS2 and EBS4 but failed to bind to EBS1, EBS3 or EBS5, although they had the correct GGAA/T core sequence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…rEts1 bound to EBS2 and EBS4 but failed to bind to EBS1, EBS3 or EBS5, although they had the correct GGAA/T core sequence. These results support the previous observations that an A in position 73 relative to the ®rst G of the core sequence and a G in position +5 favor binding of Ets1 to DNA (Fisher et al, 1991;Nye et al, 1992;Woods et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…ELK1 related SAP1 binds weakly to GGAT core binding sites, but both ELK1 and SAP1 require ACC residues¯anking one side of the core (positions 75, 74 and 73, in the ETS1 consensus) and prefer GT residues anking the other side (positions +3 and +4) to achieve binding to GGAT containing sites. It is interesting to note that these speci®c¯anking sequences, as present in the E74 oligonucleotide, confer very high a nity binding for ETS1 (Nye et al, 1992;Woods et al, 1992). FLI1 also contains the GGAT binding-associated lysine residue, but appears to bind GGAT sequences very rarely (1 in 22 binding sites tested) (Mao et al, 1994), and again only in the context of the highest a nity¯anking sequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FLI1 also contains the GGAT binding-associated lysine residue, but appears to bind GGAT sequences very rarely (1 in 22 binding sites tested) (Mao et al, 1994), and again only in the context of the highest a nity¯anking sequences. The situation of ETS1 binding to GGAT sequences is di erent, where a wide range of¯anking sequences are permissible (Nye et al, 1992;Woods et al, 1992). Thus, ETS1 can bind GGAT core sequences, even when the¯anking sequences specify low a nity binding, and other ETS family members appear to bind GGAT core sequences:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ets family has a highly conserved C-terminal DNA-binding domain, which recognizes a GGA motif. It has been noted that different Ets family members have different DNA binding specificities [34][35][36]. For example, an Ets motif in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor promoter binds with GABP but not with either Ets-2 or Elf-1 in EMSAs [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%