2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of food and beverage spoilage yeasts from DNA sequence analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A complete agreement was observed between rep‐PCR analysis and MFMA. Nowadays, for the identification of a large number of isolates recovered from any microbial communities, primary grouping before sequencing is generally performed using one of the most common DNA fingerprint methods like rep‐PCR, RADP‐PCR or PFGE; these are all time‐consuming and have poor repeatability (Kurtzman ; Bernreiter ). In this study, when the melting characteristics of all the DNA fragments for each species were simultaneously assessed, an excellent discrimination and perfect classification was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A complete agreement was observed between rep‐PCR analysis and MFMA. Nowadays, for the identification of a large number of isolates recovered from any microbial communities, primary grouping before sequencing is generally performed using one of the most common DNA fingerprint methods like rep‐PCR, RADP‐PCR or PFGE; these are all time‐consuming and have poor repeatability (Kurtzman ; Bernreiter ). In this study, when the melting characteristics of all the DNA fragments for each species were simultaneously assessed, an excellent discrimination and perfect classification was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last two decades, numerous genotypic techniques have been applied for the characterization, identification and typing of yeasts isolated from foods. Yeast species can be exactly identified by sequence analysis of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes and their internal transcribed spacers (ITS) regions (Kurtzman andRobnett 1998, 2003;Fell et al 2000;Kurtzman and Fell 2006). But, despite the high accuracy of sequencing, it is an expensive method, which is enough to prevent the identification of a large number of isolates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genome-wide genotyping techniques such as amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) can be also applied. In yeast species, the use of domains 1 and 2 (D1/D2) of the LSU rRNA gene in association with the ITS region is widely accepted as a powerful tool for rapid species identification and presumptive detection of previously unknown lineages [47]. Moreover, yeast identification in clinical diagnostics is widely supported by commercial biochemical tools like API ID32C, AuxaColor, and VITEK 2 systems [48].…”
Section: Characterization Of Biological Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For superior identification rates among closely related yeast species/strains, in addition to ITS sequencing, the D1/D2 domain of the 26S rRNA gene can be sequenced in parallel .…”
Section: Current Standards and Existing Microbiological Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%