Identification of best predictors for forecasting seasonal rainfall and runoff in Australia

Abstract

Abstract:The first step towards developing a reliable seasonal runoff forecast is identifying the key predictors that drive rainfall and runoff. This paper investigates the lag relationships between rainfall across Australia and runoff across southeast Australia versus 12 atmospheric-oceanic predictors, and how the relationships change over time. The analysis of rainfall data indicates that the relationship is greatest in spring and summer in northeast Australia and in spring in southeast Australia. The best predictors for spring rainfall in eastern Australia are NINO4 [sea surface temperature (SST) in western Pacific] and thermocline (20°C isotherm of the Pacific) and those for summer rainfall in northeast Australia are NINO4 and Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) (pressure difference between Tahiti and Darwin). The relationship in northern Australia is greatest in spring and autumn with NINO4 being the best predictor. In western Australia, the relationship is significant in summer, where SST2 (SST over the Indian Ocean) and II (SST over the Indonesian region) is the best predictor in the southwest and northwest, respectively.The analysis of runoff across southeast Australia indicates that the runoff predictability in the southern parts is greatest in winter and spring, with antecedent runoff being the best predictor. The relationship between spring runoff and NINO4, thermocline and SOI is also relatively high and can be used together with antecedent runoff to forecast spring runoff. In the northern parts of southeast Australia, the atmospheric-oceanic variables are better predictors of runoff than antecedent runoff, and have significant correlation with winter, spring and summer runoff. For longer lead times, the runoff serial correlation is reduced, especially over the northern parts, and the atmospheric-oceanic variables are likely to be better predictors for forecasting runoff. The correlations between runoff versus the predictors vary with time, and this has implications for the development of forecast relationship that assumes stationarity in the historical data.

Optimising seasonal streamflow forecast lead time for operational decision making in Australia

“…Initial catchment condition predictors, which act as a soil-moisture proxy, include streamflow totals over the preceding 1, 2 or 3 months. Predictors representing the climate conditions are monthly climate indices lagged up to 3 months (Schepen et al, 2012;Kirono et al, 2010) and include indices representing the El Niño-Southern Oscillation, variability in the Indian Ocean and variability in the southern polar circulation.…”

Predicting the June 2013 European Flooding Based on Precipitation, Soil Moisture, and Sea Level Pressure

“…Ionita et al 2008;Gámiz-Fortis et al 2010;Wood et al 2002Wood et al , 2005Wood and Lettenmaier 2006). Skillful predictions can affect decision making for land and water resources management (Kirono et al 2010). On seasonal time scales, anomalous atmospheric circulation is often linked with seasonal variations in river discharge via variations in different climatic parameters [e.g., precipitation, temperature (TT), and soil moisture (SM)] (Dettinger and Diaz 2000;Cullen et al 2002).…”

Using lagged and forecast climate indices with artificial intelligence to predict monthly rainfall in the brisbane catchment, Queensland, Australia

“…Intraseasonal, interannual and decadal variability in Queensland rainfall has been linked to complex physical phenomena remote to the Australian land mass apparent as recurring patterns in sea surface temperature (SST) and air pressure described numerically by climate indices [3,4]. Particular attention has been focussed on concurrent relationships between rainfall and climate indices associated with the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) [5], including the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) [6] and El Niño SST indices [7].…”