2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2020.101470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and distribution of nine tick-borne spotted fever group Rickettsiae in the Country of Georgia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación Territorial) and the fragment length used in data base comparison may not be long enough to discriminate among closely related species. Furthermore, R. hoogstraalii, the rickettsial species identified in these ticks, has been reported in soft ticks belonging to the genus Carios and Argas (Kawabata et al 2006, Reeves et al 2020) and the hard ticks Ixodes , Dermacentor, and Haemaphysalis (Tomassone et al 2017, Orkun et al 2014, Sukhiashvili et al 2020), including Haemaphysalis parva , Ha. punctata, and Ha.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación Territorial) and the fragment length used in data base comparison may not be long enough to discriminate among closely related species. Furthermore, R. hoogstraalii, the rickettsial species identified in these ticks, has been reported in soft ticks belonging to the genus Carios and Argas (Kawabata et al 2006, Reeves et al 2020) and the hard ticks Ixodes , Dermacentor, and Haemaphysalis (Tomassone et al 2017, Orkun et al 2014, Sukhiashvili et al 2020), including Haemaphysalis parva , Ha. punctata, and Ha.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Prevalence of pathogens in questing and feeding ticks on Tenerife Island. Carios and Argas(Kawabata et al 2006, Reeves et al 2020) and the hard ticks Ixodes, Dermacentor, and Haemaphysalis(Tomassone et al 2017, Orkun et al 2014, Sukhiashvili et al 2020, including Haemaphysalis parva,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…parva ), and Georgia ( Hae. sulcata and D. marginatus ) [ 57 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 ]. It has been also detected in other tick species, mainly Argasidae, in different parts of the world, including Japan [ 87 ], Ethiopia [ 88 ] the western Indian Ocean islands [ 89 ], Iran [ 90 ], Namibia [ 91 ], Zambia [ 92 ], China [ 93 ], and the UAE [ 94 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A positive pool with 5 individuals in it is not counted the same as a pool with 50 individuals; i.e., the prevalence of each pool would be considered 100%, whereas the MIR would be considered to be 20 and 5%, respectively. If a pool has more than one Rickettsia species in it, then it will be assumed that only one agent of each species is among the pool sample (78). For example, if a pool of 10 A. maculatum individuals had both qPCR assays for R. parkeri and R. andeanae as positive, then the MIR for both agents would be 10%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the most accurate way, though more time-consuming and costly, is to determine the prevalence of rickettsiae and the agents' identity within their arthropod hosts based on individual arthropods, not pools. Lastly, if you have both individual and pooled samples, you will have to determine both prevalence and MIR for the respective sample types (78). By definition, a pool sample cannot contain a single arthropod.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%