2021
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and classification of antiviral defence systems in bacteria and archaea with PADLOC reveals new system types

Abstract: To provide protection against viral infection and limit the uptake of mobile genetic elements, bacteria and archaea have evolved many diverse defence systems. The discovery and application of CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems has spurred recent interest in the identification and classification of new types of defence systems. Many new defence systems have recently been reported but there is a lack of accessible tools available to identify homologs of these systems in different genomes. Here, we report the Pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
126
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identification of prokaryotic innate defense systems in the W. coagulans genomes was carried out using the webtool PADLOC ( , accessed on 16 September 2021) [ 86 ]. CRISPR/Cas systems were identified with the web tool CRISPRCasTyper ( , accessed on 15 September 2021) [ 87 ] and the orientation of the CRISPR arrays was determined using CRISPRDetect ( , accessed on 15 September 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of prokaryotic innate defense systems in the W. coagulans genomes was carried out using the webtool PADLOC ( , accessed on 16 September 2021) [ 86 ]. CRISPR/Cas systems were identified with the web tool CRISPRCasTyper ( , accessed on 15 September 2021) [ 87 ] and the orientation of the CRISPR arrays was determined using CRISPRDetect ( , accessed on 15 September 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify CRISPR loci and cas genes the web tool CRISPRCasFinder was utilized with manual verification (55, 56). Searches for anti-plasmid defense systems anti-CRISPR and Wadjet were done using the AcrDB (57) and PADLOC (34) respectively. Bacteriocins were identified using the BAGEL4 web server (58) (Table S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, we analyzed whether these strains have any antiviral defense mechanisms. To search for defense mechanisms, we analyzed bacterial genomes using the Prokaryotic Antiviral Defense LOCator (PADLOC) [65] and CRISPRCasFinder [66] algorithms, and the numbers of CRISPR arrays were detected. Spacers' sequences were aligned with viral scaffolds from our study using the BLASTn-short algorithm [49], as recommended in [67].…”
Section: Bacterial Defense Mechanisms Against Virusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…strain SLB01 and Flavobacterium sp. Strain SLB02 from the Baikal sponge Lubomirskia baikalensis [64] revealed seven variants of CRISPR-Cas spacers (one in SLB01 and six in SLB02) and five other types of antiphage defense systems, including recently discovered [65,69] (dGTPase, Zorya_type I, Septu_type I, Gabija, Cbass_type III) (Supplementary Tables S4 and S5, File S3). The 14 matches of CRISPR-Cas spacers from Strain SLB02 and SLB01 were found with 13 different viral scaffolds from the sponge B. bacillifera (Supplementary File S4).…”
Section: Putative Range Of Viral Hostsmentioning
confidence: 99%