2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13132-015-0262-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ideation through Online Open Innovation Platform: Dell IdeaStorm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies' goal is to find indicators for ideas' quality and selection (Björk, di Vincenzo, Magnusson, and Mascia, ; Boudreau, ; Poetz and Schreier, ). The majority of studies therefore tap into quantitative measures based on commercial ideation platforms' direct output on the idea level by operationalizing the number of votes, comments, and idea contributors (Di Gangi and Wasko, ; Hoornaert, Ballings, Malthouse, and Van den Poel, ; Piezunka and Dahlander, ; Schemmann, Herrmann, Chappin, and Heimeriks, ), and on the individual level by counting ideators' previous ideas, the number of votes they received, their organizational position, and tenure (Bayus, ; Hoornaert et al, ; Hossain and Islam, ; Piezunka and Dahlander, ; Zhu, Li, and Andrews, ). Recent studies also include the effects of sentiments in idea description and comments, such as the positioning of commenters on ideas (Beretta, ; Coussement, Debaere, and De Ruyck, ; Hoornaert et al, ; Piezunka and Dahlander, ).…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies' goal is to find indicators for ideas' quality and selection (Björk, di Vincenzo, Magnusson, and Mascia, ; Boudreau, ; Poetz and Schreier, ). The majority of studies therefore tap into quantitative measures based on commercial ideation platforms' direct output on the idea level by operationalizing the number of votes, comments, and idea contributors (Di Gangi and Wasko, ; Hoornaert, Ballings, Malthouse, and Van den Poel, ; Piezunka and Dahlander, ; Schemmann, Herrmann, Chappin, and Heimeriks, ), and on the individual level by counting ideators' previous ideas, the number of votes they received, their organizational position, and tenure (Bayus, ; Hoornaert et al, ; Hossain and Islam, ; Piezunka and Dahlander, ; Zhu, Li, and Andrews, ). Recent studies also include the effects of sentiments in idea description and comments, such as the positioning of commenters on ideas (Beretta, ; Coussement, Debaere, and De Ruyck, ; Hoornaert et al, ; Piezunka and Dahlander, ).…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, by actively posting, viewing and voting, crowd members exchange thoughts, elaborate on rationales, raise questions, express disagreements, and collectively strike a balance through deliberate reasoning. As communicative participation facilitates the construction of mutual understanding, crowd members involved in such activities tend to be more cognitively capable of understanding different viewpoints and thus finding an optimal solution that is unique and creative [50][51][52]56]. Therefore, crowd scientists who seek for innovation should endeavor to implement systems that can encourage the crowd to make their diverse knowledge explicit as well as maintain a high level of communicative participation in crowdsourcing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on creativity has shown positive relationships between individual creativity and contextual factors such as communicating styles [53,54], indicating that creative output at the individual level is nested in the collective interaction that "constituted the social context in which the creative behavior occurs" [55, p.303]. In online ideation communities, specifically, participants who engage in communicative activities such as posting, commenting and voting can contribute more implementable ideas because they have experienced many cognitive iterations during this process [56].…”
Section: Role Of Communicative Participation In Crowdsourcing For Innmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otros antecedentes interesantes de innovación abierta en el ámbito internacional son los de empresas como Lego y Dell, las cuales mediante una estrategia de colaboración a través de una plataforma web permiten que los usuarios finales aporten ideas de mejora para sus productos (Chesbrough, 2011;Hossain & Islam, 2015). Estas ideas son evaluadas por la compañía y en caso de resultar seleccionada como una idea para ser implementada, el usuario colaborador es incluido en el proceso de implementación, permitiendo así una construcción conjunta y la generación de valor para la empresa y para el usuario.…”
Section: Objetivos Específicos Se Presentan Los Siguientes Objetivosunclassified