2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1594184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ideal glass transitions in thin films: An energy landscape perspective

Abstract: We introduce a mean-field model for the potential energy landscape of a thin fluid film confined between parallel substrates. The model predicts how the number of accessible basins on the energy landscape and, consequently, the film's ideal glass transition temperature depend on bulk pressure, film thickness, and the strength of the fluid-fluid and fluid-substrate interactions. The predictions are in qualitative agreement with the experimental trends for the kinetic glass transition temperature of thin films, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 However, this hypothesis for the origins of nanoconfinement should be taken caution because the length scale of a single CRR near T g is about 1 ∼ 4 nm, [27][28][29][30] which is much smaller than the length scale of the onset of nanoconfinement that can be as large as 100 nm for polymers. 1,2,4,5,8,19 A large amount of experimental, 3-10 simulation, 12,13,25,[31][32][33][34] and theoretical efforts [35][36][37][38][39][40][41] had been devoted to investigate the variations of T g of polymers in confinement. But there is still no consensus on the T g variation of polymers with different chain stiffness in confinement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 However, this hypothesis for the origins of nanoconfinement should be taken caution because the length scale of a single CRR near T g is about 1 ∼ 4 nm, [27][28][29][30] which is much smaller than the length scale of the onset of nanoconfinement that can be as large as 100 nm for polymers. 1,2,4,5,8,19 A large amount of experimental, 3-10 simulation, 12,13,25,[31][32][33][34] and theoretical efforts [35][36][37][38][39][40][41] had been devoted to investigate the variations of T g of polymers in confinement. But there is still no consensus on the T g variation of polymers with different chain stiffness in confinement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, thermodynamic models of the glass transition in confined polymers were proposed to describe the filmthickness dependence of T g in free-standing thin films. [41][42][43] They are based on the assumption of uniform segment density across the film thickness and, hence, do not take into account the possible non-uniform distribution of chain ends and/or strongly interacting chain moieties, such as phenyl groups of PS chains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an inference is indeed consistent with the T g observations in the context of both supported films and small MW free standing films. 16 Not surprisingly, many of the theoretical models 22,24,[40][41][42] proposed to rationalize the T g of polymer thin films also do not invoke any "polymeric" aspect of the material (albeit, exceptions do exist 43,44 ). However, since there are outlying, unexplained MW dependencies in polymeric materials, and the fact that the range of influence of surfaces seems to be much larger than that may be expected from the static structure factor, motivates reexamination of the structural features of polymers and their MW dependencies from alternative perspectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%