2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06914-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICU scoring systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Scoring systems determine predicted mortality based on initial severity at ICU admission therefore as we admit patients that are almost certainly expected to die, we may increase SMRs being inaccurate in the actual ICU performance evaluation. It is well-recognized that scoring systems often perform suboptimally when analyzing less heterogeneous populations such as sepsis, COVID-19, and transplant among others (3). However, when analyzing mixed ICUs, the impact of specific populations on SMRs also depends on the number of cases, the baseline ICU case mix, and the overall mortality of its population.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scoring systems determine predicted mortality based on initial severity at ICU admission therefore as we admit patients that are almost certainly expected to die, we may increase SMRs being inaccurate in the actual ICU performance evaluation. It is well-recognized that scoring systems often perform suboptimally when analyzing less heterogeneous populations such as sepsis, COVID-19, and transplant among others (3). However, when analyzing mixed ICUs, the impact of specific populations on SMRs also depends on the number of cases, the baseline ICU case mix, and the overall mortality of its population.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anssi Pölkki, MD 1,2 André Moser, PhD 3 Rahul Raj, MD, PhD 4 Jukka Takala, MD, PhD 5 Stepani Bendel, MD, PhD 1 Stephan M. Jakob, MD, PhD 5 Matti Reinikainen, MD, PhD 1,2 The authors reply: W e thank Amado et al (1,2) for their interest in our study on the effects of potential organ donors (PODs) on standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and benchmarking of ICUs. We agree with Amado et al (2) that SMRs are useful in evaluating ICU performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of the initial goal of CQRs was to evaluate ICU performance and benchmarking results and, several studies have been performed on the topic advancing the knowledge of performance metrics, scores, and outlier identification (6,(50)(51)(52). Such studies have been extensively reviewed elsewhere and are beyond the scope of the present article (18,50,53). Quality of care extends beyond evaluating standardized mortality rates.…”
Section: Key Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Jeroen Vandenbrande) Sementara yang paling umum digunakan pada pasien-pasien sepsis adalah Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) yang dikembangkan untuk menentukan derajat kegagalan organ, untuk stratifikasi risiko khususnya pada pasien dengan sepsis, dan untuk memantau respons terhadap pengobatan. [27] Sistem skor penyakit kritis merupakan penilaian derajat keparahan penyakit berdasarkan data spesifik yang diambil ketika perawatan. Skor APACHE II merupakan berdasarkan pada nilainilai objektif fisiologis dari variabel-variabel yang diukur selama perawatan, memberikan gambaran keadaan sebelum masuk, luaran pasien dan lama perawatan [28], sehingga diperlukan penelitian lebih lanjut mengenai karakteristik yang lain untuk memberikan pemahaman yang lebih komprehensif.…”
Section: Pembahasanunclassified