1995
DOI: 10.1016/0169-8095(94)00014-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ice microphysics and climatic temperature feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For thick clouds (type 4; Figs. 3d, i), frequencies of cloud particles are almost the same from the top to the bottom of the ice cloud layer, and the cloud particle size increases with temperature, which is consistent with Ou and Liou (1995). For very thick clouds (type 5; Figs.…”
Section: Differences In Ice Cloud Properties Over the Wp And Epsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…For thick clouds (type 4; Figs. 3d, i), frequencies of cloud particles are almost the same from the top to the bottom of the ice cloud layer, and the cloud particle size increases with temperature, which is consistent with Ou and Liou (1995). For very thick clouds (type 5; Figs.…”
Section: Differences In Ice Cloud Properties Over the Wp And Epsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This approach is rooted in earlier ice microphysics observations from aircraft and attests to the fact that small and large ice crystals are related to cold and warm temperatures in cirrus cloud layers. Ou and Liou (1995) developed a parameterization equation relating cirrus temperature to a mean effective ice crystal size (D e ) based on a large number of midlatitude cirrus microphysics data presented by Heymsfield and Platt (1984). Liou et al (2008) recently developed a correlation analysis involving IWC and D e on the basis of fundamental thermodynamic principles intended for application to climate models.…”
Section: Aerosolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The default ECMWF R eff (T) parameterization (based on the work of Ou and Liou [1995]) is showing the largest offset in transmissivity(+4%) compared with the observed values for the 13 days for the single column calculations. The other three parameterizations result in a better agreement where the smallest differences are given by the new R eff (H,Z) and R eff (30 mm) formulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one under consideration is the current RACMO2 parameterization adopted from a former version of the ECMWF-IFS (cy23r4). This parameterization (a revision from the work of Ou and Liou [1995]), hereafter referred to as R eff (T), is based on temperature only, with a linear transition in R eff from 30 to 60 mm between À60°and À40°C. The values are assumed to be constant outside this temperature regime (30 mm for T < À60°C and 60 mm for T > À40°C).…”
Section: Effective Radius Parameterizations For Use In Climate Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%