2013 12th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icdar.2013.282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICDAR 2013 Competition on Writer Identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed method is evaluated on two public datasets: IAM [18] and ICDAR 2013 writer identification contest dataset (called ICDAR2013 dataset) [3]. The IAM dataset [18] contains 1539 English handwriting document images from 657 writers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed method is evaluated on two public datasets: IAM [18] and ICDAR 2013 writer identification contest dataset (called ICDAR2013 dataset) [3]. The IAM dataset [18] contains 1539 English handwriting document images from 657 writers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ICDAR2013 dataset [3] consists of a training dataset and a test dataset, containing 100 writers and 250 writers, respectively. Each writer is asked to copy four pages of text in two languages (two in English and two in Greek).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4 shows handwriting samples from the CERUG-EN data set. We also evaluate the proposed method on the benchmarking dataset used on ICDAR2013 Competition on Writer Identification [23]. This data set contains 1000 handwritings written by 250 writers and each writer contributed four pages (two Greek and two English).…”
Section: A Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%