2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.05.180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IC‐P‐183: Reproducibility of intracranial and hippocampal volume quantification at 1.5T and 3T MRI: Application to ADNI I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Companies that provide imaging services for clinical trials, such as Bioclinica [1215] (recently merged with SYNARC [16–19]), IXICO, and Lilly [20] have used ADNI data to develop and validate their image quantification methods. For example, the learning embeddings for atlas propagation technology for repeated automated hippocampal volumetry was developed by ADNI researchers at Imperial College, London, based in part on de novo analyses of ADNI data [21,22], before being licensed to IXICO [23].…”
Section: Impacts Of Adnimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Companies that provide imaging services for clinical trials, such as Bioclinica [1215] (recently merged with SYNARC [16–19]), IXICO, and Lilly [20] have used ADNI data to develop and validate their image quantification methods. For example, the learning embeddings for atlas propagation technology for repeated automated hippocampal volumetry was developed by ADNI researchers at Imperial College, London, based in part on de novo analyses of ADNI data [21,22], before being licensed to IXICO [23].…”
Section: Impacts Of Adnimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies found that while most of the brain was identically classified at the two field strengths, there were some regional differences observed 61 . Others have reported highly reproducible volumetric data in adults with AD and controls, scanned on 1.5T and 3T scanners 62 . Upon closer investigation when comparing datasets acquired on 1.5 T and 3T scanners, we were able to conclude that there were no discernible differences in volumetric data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%