1963
DOI: 10.1063/1.3050940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical Aspects of Sound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
87
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This challenge elicited a series of increasingly sophisticated canonical treatments of pairing correlations [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41], based on a simple reduced BCS-Hamiltonian for discrete energy levels, which showed that the crossover is completely smooth, but, interestingly, depends on the parity of the number of electrons on the grain, as pointed out by von Delft et al [21]. Very recently, the main conclusions of these works were confirmed [39] using an exact solution of the reduced BCS model, discovered by Richardson in the context of nuclear physics in the 1960s [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. (The existence of this solution came as a surprise -in the form of a polite letter from its inventor -to those involved with ultrasmall grains, since hitherto it had apparently completely escaped the attention of the condensed-matter community.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This challenge elicited a series of increasingly sophisticated canonical treatments of pairing correlations [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41], based on a simple reduced BCS-Hamiltonian for discrete energy levels, which showed that the crossover is completely smooth, but, interestingly, depends on the parity of the number of electrons on the grain, as pointed out by von Delft et al [21]. Very recently, the main conclusions of these works were confirmed [39] using an exact solution of the reduced BCS model, discovered by Richardson in the context of nuclear physics in the 1960s [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. (The existence of this solution came as a surprise -in the form of a polite letter from its inventor -to those involved with ultrasmall grains, since hitherto it had apparently completely escaped the attention of the condensed-matter community.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Models of this kind had previously been studied by Richardson [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54], Strongin et al [93], Mühlschlegel et al [94,95] and Kawataba [96,97]. The first application to RBT's grains for h = 0 was by von Delft et al [21] and for h = 0 by Braun et al [21][22][23].…”
Section: A Simple Reduced Bcs Interaction Plus a Zeeman Termmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When k = 2, (22) becomes (12). However, every term for fixed ν in the sum of (22) dependents on {x (ζ) ν,i } with ν µ, which is different from that in the Gaudin-Richardosn solution of the standard pairing model [3,4], and must be considered together to be solved as shown in (22). In addition, it is obvious that W(…”
Section: The Model and Its General Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In nuclear physics, pairing interaction is considered as one of important types of residual interactions in a nuclear mean-field to describe ground state and low-energy spectroscopic properties of nuclei, such as binding energies, odd-even effects, single-particle occupancies, excitation spectra, and moments of inertia, etc [1,2]. It has been shown that either spherical or deformed mean-field plus the standard (orbit-independent) pairing interaction can be solved exactly by using the Gaudin-Richardson method [3][4][5]. The Gaudin-Richardson equations in this case can be solved more easily by using the extended Heine-Stieltjes polynomial approach [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Richardson-Gaudin method [30], the exact k-pair eigenstates of (1) with ν i = 0 for even systems or ν i = 1 for odd systems, in which i is the label of the Nilsson level that is occupied by an unpaired single particle, can be written as…”
Section: The Nilsson Mean-field Plus Standard Pairing Model and Imentioning
confidence: 99%