2015
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

motifbreakR: an R/Bioconductor package for predicting variant effects at transcription factor binding sites

Abstract: Summary: Functional annotation represents a key step toward the understanding and interpretation of germline and somatic variation as revealed by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), respectively. GWAS have revealed numerous genetic risk variants residing in non-coding DNA associated with complex diseases. For sequences that lie within enhancers or promoters of transcription, it is not straightforward to assess the effects of variants on likely transcription factor binding… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
229
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(254 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
229
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combinations of these histone modifications were used to segment the genome in these ENCODE cell lines into active and poised promoter regions with or without DNase I hypersensitivity, active and poised enhancer regions with or without DNase I hypersensitivity, putative regulatory sites with open chromatin, and CTCF bound sites outside promoters and enhancers. SNPs that could be mapped to core regions (DNase hypersensitive sites) of putative non-coding regulatory regions (enhancers and promoters) were further subjected to analysis of transcription factor binding site disruptiveness using the R/Bioconductor package motifbreakR (24). To define other physical map features (transcription start sites, 5′ UTR, 3′UTR) we downloaded annotations from the February 2009 release of the human genome (GRCh37/hg19) available from the UCSC genome browser (25).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combinations of these histone modifications were used to segment the genome in these ENCODE cell lines into active and poised promoter regions with or without DNase I hypersensitivity, active and poised enhancer regions with or without DNase I hypersensitivity, putative regulatory sites with open chromatin, and CTCF bound sites outside promoters and enhancers. SNPs that could be mapped to core regions (DNase hypersensitive sites) of putative non-coding regulatory regions (enhancers and promoters) were further subjected to analysis of transcription factor binding site disruptiveness using the R/Bioconductor package motifbreakR (24). To define other physical map features (transcription start sites, 5′ UTR, 3′UTR) we downloaded annotations from the February 2009 release of the human genome (GRCh37/hg19) available from the UCSC genome browser (25).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S5). To gain insight into the molecular pathways regulating RNASET2 expression and prioritize the number of candidate functional SNPs, we performed motif analysis to predict TF motif disruptions 22 across all SNPs which were associated with eQTL/mQTL. We then selected variants disrupting motifs of TFs expressed in T cells and focused on candidate variants in LD with the RNASET2 disease index SNP rs1819333.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Only T cell specific TFs identified as being expressed using RNA-seq data from CD patients, were carried forward. Candidate regulatory SNPs were then analyzed for potential functionality based on Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium (REMC) data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used motifbreakR (38) to search for transcription factor motifs that bind to each variant (3943). Chromatin features that overlapped variants and motifs that significantly altered binding (using the default setting with the score threshold, 0.9) are summarized in Supplementary Table S3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%