2006
Leishmania major Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in HIV-Positive Patients Does Not Spread to Extralesional Sites
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
10
1
1
0
Citation Types
0
6
0
0
Year Published
2007
2025
Publication Types
Select...
10
2
Relationship
1
11
Authors
Journals
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
References 6 publications
0
6
0
0
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Hence, they may either represent a de novo cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. major inoculated by a sand fly bite to a HIV patient or alternatively indicate the reactivation by the HIV induced immunosuppression of residual dormant parasites that persisted in the scar of a previous healed HCL due to L. major . The distinction between the two possibilities in the context of HIV infection remains an open question ( Guiguemde et al., 2003 ; Foulet et al., 2006 ; Ngouateu et al., 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Hence, they may either represent a de novo cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. major inoculated by a sand fly bite to a HIV patient or alternatively indicate the reactivation by the HIV induced immunosuppression of residual dormant parasites that persisted in the scar of a previous healed HCL due to L. major . The distinction between the two possibilities in the context of HIV infection remains an open question ( Guiguemde et al., 2003 ; Foulet et al., 2006 ; Ngouateu et al., 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, the relationship is not necessarily linear. Among six African HIV-positive patients with cutaneous L. major infection seen in an outpatient clinic in France between 1997 and 2002, five had DCL and none showed parasite dissemination beyond the lesion, despite a high viral load and very low CD4 levels in the peripheral blood (Ͻ10 cells/l) (99). In DCL, where the tendency for a Th2 response is already established, synergy could emerge early with severe negative consequences for the course of leishmaniasis.…”
Section: Cl-hiv Coinfection
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leishmania major was reported to cause DCL in a child with AIDS (104), in four coinfected patients with CD4 levels below 10/l, with no visceralization and no relapse after successful treatment (99), and in a severely immunocompromised patient in Burkina Faso, who failed to respond to treatment courses of amphotericin B deoxycholate (AMB), sodium stibogluconate, and liposomal AMB (L-AMB) but responded to miltefosine (234). A longitudinal study in the same country reported clinical polymorphism and a variable treatment response for 32 CL-HIV patients followed over a period of 16 months, with some patients presenting with more than one clinical form (173).…”
Section: Cl-hiv Coinfection
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Although the clinical presentation of cutaneous leishmaniasis is influenced by the infecting species (13,22), on an individual basis, the clinical presentation is not specific enough to allow a reliable species determination (1,7,13,32). Identification of the species can also help predict the risk of dissemination in immunocompromised patients (10,11). Thus, species identification is important to determine the clinical prognosis and to select the most appropriate therapeutic regimen to be administered to each individual.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
