2008
DOI: 10.1051/m2an:2008018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L2stability analysis of the central discontinuous Galerkin method and a comparison between the central and regular discontinuous Galerkin methods

Abstract: Abstract.We prove stability and derive error estimates for the recently introduced central discontinuous Galerkin method, in the context of linear hyperbolic equations with possibly discontinuous solutions. A comparison between the central discontinuous Galerkin method and the regular discontinuous Galerkin method in this context is also made. Numerical experiments are provided to validate the quantitative conclusions from the analysis.Mathematics Subject Classification. 65M60.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
79
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
79
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2 when the Hamiltonian H in (1.1) is linear. The analysis is closely related to those in [6,31]. Though only the results for one dimensional cases are presented, similar results can be obtained for multi-dimensional cases.…”
Section: Theoretical Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 when the Hamiltonian H in (1.1) is linear. The analysis is closely related to those in [6,31]. Though only the results for one dimensional cases are presented, similar results can be obtained for multi-dimensional cases.…”
Section: Theoretical Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Central DG methods were introduced in [29][30][31] for hyperbolic conservation laws, and they combine the central scheme [22,28,32] and the DG method. These methods evolve two copies of approximating solutions defined on overlapping meshes, and they avoid the use of Riemann solvers which can be complicated and costly for system of equations [26].…”
Section: ∂ T ϕ(X T) + H (X ∇ X ϕ(X T))mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we use overlapping cells and hence duplicative information, thereby avoiding numerical fluxes which is a distinct advantage of central schemes. This work is a continuation of our earlier work in [6,7] in which we presented and analyzed central DG schemes for hyperbolic PDEs. We would like to point out that the discussion on the difficulties related to numerical fluxes for DG methods solving diffusion equations has Keywords and phrases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In Section 2.2 we provide an L 2 a priori error estimate for smooth solutions. In Section 2.3 we give a quantitative error estimate for this central LDG scheme for the polynomial degree up to 1 using Fourier analysis, similar to the technique used in [7,10,11]. As indicated before, we assume periodic boundary conditions.…”
Section: Analysis Of the First Version Of The Central Ldg Scheme On Omentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation