2007
DOI: 10.1086/520491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hubble Space TelescopeParallaxes of AM CVn Stars and Astrophysical Consequences

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
131
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
131
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Together with estimates for the component masses from the absolute magnitudes this has led to estimates of the expected LISA signal that are well determined with reliable error bars ( Fig. 2 and Roelofs et al, 2007a). For the shortest periods systems the distances and component masses are not (yet) well determined enough to give well defined signal estimates.…”
Section: Verification Binariesmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Together with estimates for the component masses from the absolute magnitudes this has led to estimates of the expected LISA signal that are well determined with reliable error bars ( Fig. 2 and Roelofs et al, 2007a). For the shortest periods systems the distances and component masses are not (yet) well determined enough to give well defined signal estimates.…”
Section: Verification Binariesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As each position in the sky is visited many times (typically around 90 times) parallax and proper motion of all objects will be determined. Only for a handful of AM CVn stars their parameters are well determined and reliable error bars can be given (Roelofs et al, 2007a), the rest are estimates. The dashed line shows the LISA sensitivity, the solid line an estimate of the Galactic foreground noise (from Nelemans et al, 2004b).…”
Section: Egaps the European Galactic Plane Survey (Egaps) Is Surveyinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gravitational wave strain amplitude h scales with the masses of both binary components, the binary inclination, the orbital period and the distance of the system. We calculate it as described in Roelofs et al (2007) to be as high as log h = −21.5 ± 0.3; CD-30 • 11223 should therefore be one of the strongest gravitational wave sources detectable with missions like NGO/eLISA (Kilic et al 2012;Nelemans 2009). It is even more noticeable, because the presence of eclipses allows us determine its binary parameters to very high accuracy.…”
Section: Gravitational Wave Radiationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The orbital period is 1029 s (Harvey et al 1998). For primary and secondary masses there are several values in discussion, with the most agreed upon being M WD ≈ 0.7 M and M 2 ≈ 0.1 M (Roelofs et al 2007). However, using synthetic spectra of a large grid of accretion-disk models (Nagel et al 2009) calculated with AD, we found the best agreement with observation for models with M WD = 0.6 M and an accretion ratė M = 1 × 10 −8 M yr −1 .…”
Section: Standard Hydrodynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%