2016
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1613508113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drosophila IRBP bZIP heterodimer binds P-element DNA and affects hybrid dysgenesis

Abstract: In Drosophila, P-element transposition causes mutagenesis and genome instability during hybrid dysgenesis. The P-element 31-bp terminal inverted repeats (TIRs) contain sequences essential for transposase cleavage and have been implicated in DNA repair via protein-DNA interactions with cellular proteins. The identity and function of these cellular proteins were unknown. Biochemical characterization of proteins that bind the TIRs identified a heterodimeric basic leucine zipper (bZIP) complex between an uncharact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
49
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(69 reference statements)
7
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Xrp1 was previously involved in genotoxic stress (irradiation) response, and the maintenance of genome integrity downstream of p53 (Akdemir et al, 2007) and during P-element dysgenesis (Francis et al, 2016). Our results uncover another function for Xrp1 as a growth regulator.…”
Section: Xrp1 Is a Growth Inhibitormentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Xrp1 was previously involved in genotoxic stress (irradiation) response, and the maintenance of genome integrity downstream of p53 (Akdemir et al, 2007) and during P-element dysgenesis (Francis et al, 2016). Our results uncover another function for Xrp1 as a growth regulator.…”
Section: Xrp1 Is a Growth Inhibitormentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Xrp1 has previously been implicated in the response to genotoxic stress (irradiation), the maintenance of genome integrity downstream of p53 (Akdemir et al, 2007) and during P-element dysgenesis (Francis et al, 2016). In order to gain insights into its putative growth-related function, we generated transgenic animals expressing the short and the long isoforms of Xrp1 under UAS control (UAS-xrp1-S and UAS-xrp1-L).…”
Section: Xrp1 Overexpression Is Sufficient To Trigger Non-autonomous mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xrp1 was previously involved in genotoxic stress (irradiation) response, and the maintenance of genome integrity downstream of p53 (Akdemir et al, 2007) and during P-element dysgenesis (Francis et al, 2016). Our results uncover a new function for Xrp1 as a growth regulator.…”
Section: Xrp1 Is a Growth Inhibitormentioning
confidence: 59%
“…5D,E,K) whereas the knock-down of Xrp1 very efficiently suppressed the growth and Mmp1 expression in NS tissues. This suggests that .CG6272/CEBPG could be acting in combination with its bZIP partner Xrp1 in this context (Francis et al, 2016; Reinke et al, 2013). Although the cellular processes controlled by CG6272/Xrp1 remain to be determined, the fact that Xrp1 is an early p53 target gene (Akdemir et al, 2007; Link et al, 2013), raises the possibility that its functions could be related to DNA/genome integrity maintenance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Interestingly, we did not observe any effect knocking down Crc , the fly Atf4 homologue, suggesting that during NS overgrowth in Drosophila , CG6272/Irbp18 could be acting in combination with another partner. CG6272/Irbp18 also interacts with Xrp1, and the heterodimer has been implicated in DNA repair (Akdemir et al, 2007; Francis et al, 2016). We thus propose that the Irbp18/Xrp1 dimer is activated in NS and is required to facilitate DNA repair and ensure genomic stability to prevent catastrophic genotoxic effect upon the combined cellular stresses of S and replication stress of N. Recently, Xrp1 together with its binding partner CG6272/Irbp18 (but not Atf4) has been shown to mediate a loser status in ribosomal genes deficient cells, through the implementation of a specific transcriptional program (Baillon et al, 2018; Blanco et al, 2020; Ji et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%