1994
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.49.1397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

d-wave superconductor as a model of high-Tcsuperconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
238
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 361 publications
(257 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
18
238
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the different symmetries of the order parameter a different behaviour of λ L (T ) has been predicted and experimentally found [65,66,67]. The presence of Andreev bound states at surfaces of HTS can have a significant effect on the low temperature dependence of the London penetration depth.…”
Section: Anomalous Meissner Currentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For the different symmetries of the order parameter a different behaviour of λ L (T ) has been predicted and experimentally found [65,66,67]. The presence of Andreev bound states at surfaces of HTS can have a significant effect on the low temperature dependence of the London penetration depth.…”
Section: Anomalous Meissner Currentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…the multigap model) in order to account for the nodal superconductor seen in Sr 2 RuO 4 through the specific heat [14] and the magnetic penetration depth [15]. Indeed all four states have the same quasiparticle density of states as d-wave superconductors [16]. As we shall see later, however, the multigap model is incompatible with the angle dependent magnetothermal conductivity observed by Izawa et al [5] and the universal heat conduction in κ zz observed by Suzuki et al [17] in Sr 2 RuO 4 .…”
Section: The Volovik Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of a magnetic field the quasiparticle density of states (DOS) of these four superconductors is given by [16] …”
Section: The Volovik Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origin of this difference lies in the gap symmetry. In d-wave superconductors, the coherence peaks in the BCS DOS are weak logarithmic singularities 37 while in s-wave superconductors, they are strong square-root divergences. The strength of the scattering-rate peak at ⍀ sr + ⌬ 0 , and consequently the strength of the dip in the DOS and tunneling spectrum, are determined by the strength of the coherence peaks in the BCS DOS, as is clear from Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%