2008
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200801279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C3‐Symmetric Lanthanide Tris(alkoxide) Complexes Formed by Preferential Complexation and Their Stereoselective Polymerization of rac‐Lactide

Abstract: Restoring order: YIII, EuIII, and ErIII tris(ligand) complexes of a new chiral alkoxide ligand, tBu2P(O)CH2CH(tBu)OH (HL), preferentially form as C3‐symmetric diastereomers. Thus racemic HL affords (RRR)‐ and (SSS)‐[LnL3] complexes, which are active catalysts for the stereoselective polymerization of rac‐lactide to afford highly isotactic polylactic acid.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
64
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the latter could indicate the presence of stronger Ga-C 6-Mes bond in solution [25], it rather reflects the stronger donor properties of 6-Mes vs SIMes/IMes in the light of both the structure of 1, as well as the weaker Ga-C 6-Mes evidenced by the X-ray analysis of Me 2 Ga(OCPh 2 Me)(6-Mes) (3) (see below). While the carbene carbon signal in 13 C NMR could not be observed for Me 2 GaOMe(6-Mes), which was synthesized analogously to 1, the 1 H NMR was in line with the presence of the equilibrium presented in Scheme 1 (see the Supplementary Materials), and therefore, similarly to 1, indicated weaker Ga-C 6-Mes bond in comparison with Ga-C NHC of Me 2 GaOMe(NHC) (NHC = SIMes, IMes).…”
Section: Reactivity Of [Me2m(μ-or)]n (M= Ga In ; or = Och2ch2ome Ommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Although the latter could indicate the presence of stronger Ga-C 6-Mes bond in solution [25], it rather reflects the stronger donor properties of 6-Mes vs SIMes/IMes in the light of both the structure of 1, as well as the weaker Ga-C 6-Mes evidenced by the X-ray analysis of Me 2 Ga(OCPh 2 Me)(6-Mes) (3) (see below). While the carbene carbon signal in 13 C NMR could not be observed for Me 2 GaOMe(6-Mes), which was synthesized analogously to 1, the 1 H NMR was in line with the presence of the equilibrium presented in Scheme 1 (see the Supplementary Materials), and therefore, similarly to 1, indicated weaker Ga-C 6-Mes bond in comparison with Ga-C NHC of Me 2 GaOMe(NHC) (NHC = SIMes, IMes).…”
Section: Reactivity Of [Me2m(μ-or)]n (M= Ga In ; or = Och2ch2ome Ommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of the strength of In-C6-Mes bond of 2 in solution, in comparison with In-CNHC bonds of already characterized Me3In(NHC) adducts [3,21,23], was in sharp contrast with the solid state result. In solution, the shift between free and coordinated NHCs in 13 Although the reaction of 6-Mes with [Me 2 In(µ-OMe)] 3 led to the formation of Me 2 InOMe(6-Mes) complex (see the Supplementary Materials), which was more stable in comparison with Me 2 In(OCH 2 CH 2 OMe)(6-Mes), it seemed to disproportionate more readily in comparison with Me 2 InOMe(NHC) (NHC = SIMes, IMes), and as result could not be isolated in contrast to the latter [3]. While we could not estimate the strength of In-C 6-Mes in the case of Me 2 InOR(6-Mes), due to the tendency of the latter to disproportionate , it could be analyzed for the Me 3 In(6-Mes) (2).…”
Section: Reactivity Of [Me2m(μ-or)]n (M= Ga In ; or = Och2ch2ome Ommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations