1998
DOI: 10.1063/1.882103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
2,555
2
56

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,205 publications
(2,644 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
31
2,555
2
56
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of that, an uncertainty analysis is needed to determine the uncertainty in the computed fraction of sp 2 -bonded carbon. The analysis below, performed following the Law of Propagation of Uncertainties 71 , assumes that the sample under investigation is isotropic, and either amorphous or polycrystalline (with grain size << X-ray beam diameter), meaning that the π*/σ* ratio for this material does not vary with the X-ray incidence angle.…”
Section: Eq 3amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of that, an uncertainty analysis is needed to determine the uncertainty in the computed fraction of sp 2 -bonded carbon. The analysis below, performed following the Law of Propagation of Uncertainties 71 , assumes that the sample under investigation is isotropic, and either amorphous or polycrystalline (with grain size << X-ray beam diameter), meaning that the π*/σ* ratio for this material does not vary with the X-ray incidence angle.…”
Section: Eq 3amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 lists the calculated optimum take-off angles for the five jumpers. The standard error associated with the calculated optimum take-off angle was determined using the quadrature method of combining errors (Taylor, 1997). The method of calculating the optimum take-off angle used here was expected to produce values that were in good agreement with the jumper's preferred take-off angle.…”
Section: The Optimum Take-off Anglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the point shown for N ϭ 1 corresponds to the actual measurement value and is shown without error bars, since the mean and SD cannot be obtained from a single value. The accuracy of this single measurement, shown as an empty circle, is not surprising given the small CV exp value; classical statistics predict that there is a 68% probability that a single measurement will fall within Ϯ 1 of the population mean (49). Figure 5 shows that the population mean estimate provided by a data set containing N min values (N min Յ 4 established above for this data), is within 1 SD of the population mean.…”
Section: Application To Flow Cytometry Sizing Of Dna Fragmentsmentioning
confidence: 75%