1979
DOI: 10.1086/372732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abraham in History and Tradition. John van Seters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, some reviewers (e.g., Cazelles, 1978;Pardee, 1979;Roberts, 1977) dismissed Van Seters' reconstruction because it took account of Genesis alone, and only part of Genesis at that. They implied that such a theory might not be able to explain the composition of the entire Torah, or of at least the Tetrateuch.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, some reviewers (e.g., Cazelles, 1978;Pardee, 1979;Roberts, 1977) dismissed Van Seters' reconstruction because it took account of Genesis alone, and only part of Genesis at that. They implied that such a theory might not be able to explain the composition of the entire Torah, or of at least the Tetrateuch.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%