2008
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypoxia-Independent Activation of HIF-1 by Enterobacteriaceae and Their Siderophores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
121
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
121
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Holden et al demonstrated that bacterial siderophores such as enterobactin chelate iron to the extent that HIF is stabilized and HIF target genes are induced (94). Likewise, it was shown that siderophores from a number of bacterial genera (e.g., Salmonella, Yersenia, Enterobacter) are capable of stabilizing HIF (95 (110). Importantly, similar Paneth cell defects have been reported for knockin transgenic mice and CD patients homozygous for the ATG16L1 T300A risk allele (109,111).…”
Section: Host-microbial Metabolism and Tissue Barriermentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Holden et al demonstrated that bacterial siderophores such as enterobactin chelate iron to the extent that HIF is stabilized and HIF target genes are induced (94). Likewise, it was shown that siderophores from a number of bacterial genera (e.g., Salmonella, Yersenia, Enterobacter) are capable of stabilizing HIF (95 (110). Importantly, similar Paneth cell defects have been reported for knockin transgenic mice and CD patients homozygous for the ATG16L1 T300A risk allele (109,111).…”
Section: Host-microbial Metabolism and Tissue Barriermentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Mucosa-associated microbiota are likely also prominent modulators of potential hypoxia-elicited autophagic responses (see Figure 2). Both commensal and pathogenic species have been shown to influence mucosal pO 2 and/or enterocyte HIF signaling (95,121,122), and ablation of epithelial HIF-1 increases susceptibility to pathogen infection in a number of studies (95,121). Reciprocally, intestinal oxygenation directly shapes the composition of gut microbial communities, and oxidative changes in intestinal inflammation may underlie the dysbiosis characteristic of IBD (5).…”
Section: Metabolic Regulation Of Epithelial Autophagymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mice, which fail to adapt to oxygen deprivation, are more susceptible to infections with streptococci (37,38), staphylococci (39), and enteric Yersinia (40). In the case of group A streptococci, the increased susceptibility to infection was associated with the failure of HIF-1a-deficient mice to upregulate the antimicrobial peptide CRAMP, the murine homolog of cathelicidin (39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in contrast to our acute gut I/R results, HIF-1␣ was found to be protective in more chronic gut injury models utilizing colon-specific HIF-1␣-deficient mice. These models included 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid -induced colitis (12,37,56), chronic hypoxia (24), and Yersinia enterocolitica orogastric infection (28). In the context of gut I/R injury, one study found that mice administered the hydroxylase inhibitor, dimethyloxalglycine (DMOG) was pro- tective in a localized gut I/R injury model (superior mesenteric artery occlusion for 15 min and 3 h reperfusion), and HIF-1 mediated its protective effects via CD73 (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the role of HIF-1, as protective or deleterious, may depend on whether the insult is acute or chronic, the segments of the intestine injured, as well as on whether the loss of HIF-1␣ is partial or total. For example, the chronic studies, where HIF-1 was protective, utilized conditional intestinal and colonic epithelial HIF-1␣ mice (28,37,56), whereas our studies were performed in mice with a partial HIF-1␣ deficiency that involves the entire gut. These differences may be important, since the segment of the gut that is susceptible to acute gut I/R-mediated injury is the distal small intestine (33,69).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%