2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2008.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypofractionated Radiotherapy plus Cetuximab in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This regime employs a fraction size of 2.6 Gy per fraction. The 4-week regime 55 Gy in 20# over 25 days has historically been used with several single agents including methotrexate, cetuximab, carboplatin and capecitabine for locally advanced diseases [13][14][15][16][17][18]. More recent IMRT series have used 55 Gy in 20 fractions with synchronous single agent cisplatin, carboplatin and cetuximab [8,19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This regime employs a fraction size of 2.6 Gy per fraction. The 4-week regime 55 Gy in 20# over 25 days has historically been used with several single agents including methotrexate, cetuximab, carboplatin and capecitabine for locally advanced diseases [13][14][15][16][17][18]. More recent IMRT series have used 55 Gy in 20 fractions with synchronous single agent cisplatin, carboplatin and cetuximab [8,19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 4 week regime 55 Gy in 20# over 25 days has historically been used with several single agents including methotrexate, cetuximab, carboplatin and capecitabine for locally advanced disease disease [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] . More recent IMRT series have used 55 Gy in 20 fractions with synchronous single agent cisplatin, carboplatin and cetuximab [13] , [34] , [35] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reasons could explain discrepancies in incidence rates; these can include the use of different toxicity classification systems, bias in the selection of patients, and the use of different techniques and radiation doses. Additionally, observational data suggest that, natural killer although there could be a greater incidence of grade 3 or 4 radiodermatitis in patients with BRT compared with chemoradiotherapy (CRT), CRT adverse effects could exert a greater negative impact on symptomatology severity and therapy compliance …”
Section: Bioradiodermatitismentioning
confidence: 99%