2013
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1349516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperkinetische Störungen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland: Administrative Prävalenz und regionale Unterschiede in der Diagnosehäufigkeit

Abstract: Regional differences in administrative prevalence rates and discrepancies in diagnosis coding by different physicians may indicate uncertainties regarding HK-diagnosis in routine health care. Future studies should analyse these associations more detailed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with previous studies, in which children and adolescents with ADHD displayed a higher risk of injuries than healthy controls ( 10 , 12 , 14 , 21 ), and also in line with previous studies assessing injury patterns among children with ADHD ( 11 , 21 , 23 , 40 ). Although the country-specific setting might influence if children are diagnosed with ADHD, depending on diagnostic modalities and a threshold of symptom severity applied in routine health care (for example reflected in regional differences in prevalence or sex ratio of diagnosed cases) ( 41 , 42 ), and consequently in those diagnosed, the risk of injuries can be different, this does not seem to translate into different findings in our analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These findings are consistent with previous studies, in which children and adolescents with ADHD displayed a higher risk of injuries than healthy controls ( 10 , 12 , 14 , 21 ), and also in line with previous studies assessing injury patterns among children with ADHD ( 11 , 21 , 23 , 40 ). Although the country-specific setting might influence if children are diagnosed with ADHD, depending on diagnostic modalities and a threshold of symptom severity applied in routine health care (for example reflected in regional differences in prevalence or sex ratio of diagnosed cases) ( 41 , 42 ), and consequently in those diagnosed, the risk of injuries can be different, this does not seem to translate into different findings in our analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A prior meta-analysis by the same research group focused solely on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)/hyperkinetic disorder (HD) and found a prevalence of 5.3% (95% CI 5.0–5.6, Polanczyk et al [5]). An analysis of German Health claims data shows that the ADHD diagnosis prevalence increased from about 2.4% in 2001 to 6.1% in 2014 [6,7,8,9]. ADHD may also persist into adulthood [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörung (ADHS) stellt mit einer Prävalenzrate von ca. 3 bis 7 % weltweit (Deutschland: 4-5 %) eine der häufigsten psychischen Störungen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen dar [1][2][3][4]. Eine der meist zitierten Prävalenzstudien von Kessler et al gibt die ADHS-Prävalenz der erwachsenen Bevölkerung (18-44 Jahre) mit 4,4 % an [5].…”
Section: Hintergrundunclassified
“…Die Imputationen beruhen auf multiplen Regressionsverfahren auf Grundlage multivariater Normalverteilung (eine genaue Beschreibung des Verfahrens findet sich bei bei [24]). Für die Variable des sozioökonomischen Beschäftigungsstatus wird bei familienversicherten Kindern der Status des Elternteils als Mitglied verwendet 1 . Fehlt auch die Angabe des Mitglieds, sind wiederum Imputationsverfahren notwendig.…”
Section: Hintergrundunclassified