2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-012-1090-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrophilic polycarbonate chips for generation of oil-in-water (O/W) and water-in-oil-in-water (W/O/W) emulsions

Abstract: Modification of the surfaces of polycarbonate (PC) with the use of a solution of tin (II) chloride renders them hydrophilic. The surface draping is stable against exposure to water and to alcohols. Exposure to alkanes reduces but does not diminish the effect. The method is compatible-in using the same solvent and temperature-with the hydrophobic modification of PC Jankowski et al. ( Lab Chip 11:748-752, 2011). The combination of these methods makes it possible to generate single and multiple monodisperse emul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Please note that our approach can generate highly uniform DEs, with a coefficient of variation (C.V.) < 1.4% (see Figure S4). This value is comparable to or smaller than those for the DEs generated by other methods, for example, multimodule co-axial flow-focusing capillaries (C.V. = 2.5–3.0% ,, ), multimodule connected microfluidic chips (C.V. = 2.5–3.0%), , layer-by-layer assembly (C.V. = 5.2–7.3%), , chemical functionalization by flow confinement (C.V. = 1.3–4.2%), ,, plasma oxidation (C.V. = 2.1–2.5%), ,, and localized UV treatment of glass (C.V. < 8.0%) . We noted that the stability of generated DEs can be further improved by different approaches, such as using proper surfactants , and maintaining the balance of the osmotic pressure between the inner phase and the outer phase .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Please note that our approach can generate highly uniform DEs, with a coefficient of variation (C.V.) < 1.4% (see Figure S4). This value is comparable to or smaller than those for the DEs generated by other methods, for example, multimodule co-axial flow-focusing capillaries (C.V. = 2.5–3.0% ,, ), multimodule connected microfluidic chips (C.V. = 2.5–3.0%), , layer-by-layer assembly (C.V. = 5.2–7.3%), , chemical functionalization by flow confinement (C.V. = 1.3–4.2%), ,, plasma oxidation (C.V. = 2.1–2.5%), ,, and localized UV treatment of glass (C.V. < 8.0%) . We noted that the stability of generated DEs can be further improved by different approaches, such as using proper surfactants , and maintaining the balance of the osmotic pressure between the inner phase and the outer phase .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Polycarbonate (PC) is an important thermoplastic material that finds many uses, including in optical, biomedical, patterned microarray assay, and microfluidic devices . PC is generally rigid, optically clear, and has good chemical and thermal stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microchannel devices made of thermoplastic polymers are less expensive than those made of glass, less adsorptive towards bio-molecules than polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and suitable to be mass-produced by hot embossing or injection moulding technologies [26]. Thermoplastic polymers such as polycarbonate (PC) [27,28], poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) [29][30][31], and polystyrene (PS) [32] are the most commonly used materials. Low glass transition (LGT) polymers, such as PC and PMMA are not suitable for modification by the photolithography process, since high temperatures lead to deformation of the polymer material.…”
Section: Microfluidics and Microchannelsmentioning
confidence: 99%