Hydrological Processes in Regional Climate Model Simulations of the Central United States Flood of June–July 1993

Abstract

Thirteen regional climate model (RCM) simulations of June-July 1993 were compared with each other and observations. Water vapor conservation and precipitation characteristics in each RCM were examined for a 10° × 10° subregion of the upper Mississippi River basin, containing the region of maximum 60-day accumulated precipitation in all RCMs and station reports. All RCMs produced positive precipitation minus evapotranspiration (P − E > 0), though most RCMs produced P − Ebelow the observed range. RCM recycling ratios were within the range estimated from observations. No evidence of common errors of E was found. In contrast, common dry bias of P was found in the simulations. Daily cycles of terms in the water vapor conservation equation were qualitatively similar in most RCMs. Nocturnal maximums of P and C (convergence) occurred in 9 of 13 RCMs, consistent with observations. Three of the four driest simulations failed to couple P and C overnight, producing afternoon maximum P. Further, dry simulations tended to produce a larger fraction of their 60-day accumulated precipitation from low 3-h totals. In station reports, accumulation from high (low) 3-h totals had a nocturnal (early morning) maximum. This time lag occurred, in part, because many mesoscale convective systems had reached peak intensity overnight and had declined in intensity by early morning. None of the RCMs contained such a time lag. It is recommended that short-period experiments be performed to examine the ability of RCMs to simulate mesoscale convective systems prior to generating long-period simulations for hydroclimatology. Disciplines

Reanalysis-driven climate simulation over CORDEX North America domain using the Canadian Regional Climate Model, version 5: model performance evaluation

“…Previous evaluations of RCM simulations of the recent climate over the whole North American continent have been realized within Model Intercomparison Projects (MIPs) such as the Project to Intercompare Regional Climate Simulations (PIRCS) (Gutowski et al 1998;Takle et al 1999;Anderson et al 2003) and North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP) (Mearns et al 2009(Mearns et al , 2012Gutowski et al 2010). Gutowski et al (2010) studied the performance of six GCM-driven RCMs in simulating the extreme monthly precipitations over North America for the [1981][1982][1983][1984][1985][1986][1987][1988][1989][1990][1991][1992][1993][1994][1995][1996][1997][1998][1999] period within the NARCCAP project.…”

Transferability Intercomparison: An Opportunity for New Insight on the Global Water Cycle and Energy Budget

“…Jones et al (1995) find that higher vertical velocity and altered precipitation can also result from higher resolution. Regional models have further demonstrated capabilities for resolving key mesoscale features of the hydrological cycle such as the diurnal cycle and spatial dynamics that resemble mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) (Anderson et al 2003). The resolution of spatial variations of low-level jet characteristics is needed in the U.S. Great Plains, for instance, for the simulation of extreme precipitation events and high spatial variability of precipitation, which can trigger long-term memory into the climate system resulting from soil moisture recharge (Koster et al 2004).…”

25 Years Inter-Research 1979-2004

“…3A) were also observed over the central United States; these regional floods have been extensively documented elsewhere (e.g. Giorgi et al 1996, Anderson et al 2003). …”