2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3199(01)00014-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen adsorption in carbon nanostructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

25
108
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
25
108
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A well-known rule of thumb for hydrogen storage in physisorbent materials is "Chahine's rule" 26 which predicts 1 wt% Gibbs excess maximum uptake per 500 m 2 g -1 of BET surface area at 77 K. A similar trend has been shown for methane uptake in physisorbent materials at 298 K, 27,28 and the carbons in this study are consistent with previous reports (shown in Figure S12). The relationship for methane is 4.4 mmol g -1 (6.6 wt%) Gibbs excess maximum uptake per 1000 m 2 g -1 of BET surface area at 298 K. Figure S12.…”
Section: Dependence Of Measured Uptake Capacity On Surface Areasupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A well-known rule of thumb for hydrogen storage in physisorbent materials is "Chahine's rule" 26 which predicts 1 wt% Gibbs excess maximum uptake per 500 m 2 g -1 of BET surface area at 77 K. A similar trend has been shown for methane uptake in physisorbent materials at 298 K, 27,28 and the carbons in this study are consistent with previous reports (shown in Figure S12). The relationship for methane is 4.4 mmol g -1 (6.6 wt%) Gibbs excess maximum uptake per 1000 m 2 g -1 of BET surface area at 298 K. Figure S12.…”
Section: Dependence Of Measured Uptake Capacity On Surface Areasupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the second communication [9], are presented somewhat more modest values of reversible sorption -up to 4 molecules Н 2 /atom С, which still exceeds twice the H/C atomic ratio in СН 4 and corresponds to the sorption of 0.4 g Н 2 /g С. But these values have not been confirmed by other authors and were subject to the strict critics [7,[10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For instance, according to Gupta and Strivastava, the CFC prepared from ethylenе at 600°C over the Cu/Ni catalysts have the hydrogen storage capacity of 10÷15 wt.% at the pressure of 90 atm [31] (however, it should be noted that these CFC could contain a rather significant amount of Ni, which was used as a catalyst; therefore part of the sorption can be assigned to the formation of hydride NiH 3 ). On the other hand, according to Poirier et al [14], the CFC produced from acetylene or ethylene over the Ni or Cu/Ni catalysts at the same hydrogen pressure demonstrated the storage capacity of onlỹ 0.7 wt.%. It is remarkable, that upon the same hydrogen pressure of 10.5 МРа the identical capacity was shown by supermicroporous АХ-21 [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Strobel et al [162] were also unable to confirm the high storage capacity values of CNFs. Poirier et al [163] studied hydrogen adsorption in various carbon nanostructures including nanofibers. They found that at room temperature CNFs could adsorb merely 0.7 wt.% at 105 bar.…”
Section: Carbon and Carbon-based Nanostructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%