“…In summary, based on the scaling laws and experimental results, we suggest that the major reasons the SL applies reduced imaging forces are a) its stiffness is ;40% (nominal) smaller, and b) its Q-factor close to the sample is much larger than that of the CL, which actually becomes overdamped when brought into the vicinity of the sample. The dependence of cantilever damping on its vicinity to the sample is well known (19,28,29). The fact that the SL has a much longer tip length than the CL assures us that its distance from the sample is larger, thus minimizing the hydrodynamic damping of the viscous squeeze film between the cantilever and the sample.…”