2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2759197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamics of torsional probes for atomic force microscopy in liquids

Abstract: Improving the force resolution of atomic force microscopy for soft samples in liquid requires soft cantilevers with reduced hydrodynamic cross section. Single and dual axis torsion levers ͓Beyder and Sachs, 2006͔ are an attractive technology. They have reduced area and reduced drift due to the symmetric support ͓Beyder et al., 2006͔ can add a second dimension using two independent axes. Here we investigate the hydrodynamics of these probes using three-dimensional transient fluid-structure interaction models wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, based on the scaling laws and experimental results, we suggest that the major reasons the SL applies reduced imaging forces are a) its stiffness is ;40% (nominal) smaller, and b) its Q-factor close to the sample is much larger than that of the CL, which actually becomes overdamped when brought into the vicinity of the sample. The dependence of cantilever damping on its vicinity to the sample is well known (19,28,29). The fact that the SL has a much longer tip length than the CL assures us that its distance from the sample is larger, thus minimizing the hydrodynamic damping of the viscous squeeze film between the cantilever and the sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, based on the scaling laws and experimental results, we suggest that the major reasons the SL applies reduced imaging forces are a) its stiffness is ;40% (nominal) smaller, and b) its Q-factor close to the sample is much larger than that of the CL, which actually becomes overdamped when brought into the vicinity of the sample. The dependence of cantilever damping on its vicinity to the sample is well known (19,28,29). The fact that the SL has a much longer tip length than the CL assures us that its distance from the sample is larger, thus minimizing the hydrodynamic damping of the viscous squeeze film between the cantilever and the sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%