2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydro-mechanical modeling of sinkhole occurrence processes in covered karst terrains during a flood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It will be calibrated using the hydro-geo-data acquired above. The coupling of different techniques (computational fluid dynamics and discrete elements) has become increasingly used and most promising for hydromechanical collapse processes [89,90]. The model results will be upscaled to multichannel systems, and a conceptual model should be established for the region.…”
Section: Datasets and Methods For Field Campaigns And Geotouristic Tr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will be calibrated using the hydro-geo-data acquired above. The coupling of different techniques (computational fluid dynamics and discrete elements) has become increasingly used and most promising for hydromechanical collapse processes [89,90]. The model results will be upscaled to multichannel systems, and a conceptual model should be established for the region.…”
Section: Datasets and Methods For Field Campaigns And Geotouristic Tr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge, therefore, is to obtain insights into their dynamics-either short or long term-to evaluate their risk potential [15]. To do so, many analogue experiments [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and numerical models [4,13,22,[25][26][27][28] have been proposed in the literature (see also [29] for a complementary review). However, these models mostly consider a homogeneous sedimentary bed and scarcely account for its complex structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many methods for sinkhole risk mitigation have been developed, including: (i) methods that use subsurface sensors (e.g., conventional seismic stations, nano‐seismic monitoring, borehole extensometers and reflectometry techniques; Dahm et al, 2011; Gutiérrez et al, 2019; Land, 2013); (ii) remote sensing methodologies (e.g., radar interferometry for the evaluation of subsidence rates, airborne laser scanning and photogrammetry; Galve et al, 2011; Gutiérrez et al, 2019); (iii) methods that use apparatus in direct contact with the ground surface (e.g., trenching for the precise delimitation of specific sinkholes, ground‐based interferometric measures, high‐precision topographic profiling, Differential Global Navigation Satellite System or Differential Global Positioning System [DGNSS or DGPS], terrestrial laser scanning, measures with tiltmeters; Galve et al, 2011; Gutiérrez et al, 2019); (iv) geomorphological approaches and GIS‐based large‐scale mapping (Cahalan & Milewski, 2018; Nam et al, 2020; Perrin et al, 2015; Zumpano et al, 2019); (v) predictive stability charts developed on the basis of finite or discrete element modelling (FEM or DEM) or laboratory experiments based on equivalent physical models (Al‐Halbouni et al, 2019; Goodings & Abdulla, 2002; Jia et al, 2018; Luu et al, 2019; Perrotti et al, 2019; Xiao et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%