“…In recent years, many methods for sinkhole risk mitigation have been developed, including: (i) methods that use subsurface sensors (e.g., conventional seismic stations, nano‐seismic monitoring, borehole extensometers and reflectometry techniques; Dahm et al, 2011; Gutiérrez et al, 2019; Land, 2013); (ii) remote sensing methodologies (e.g., radar interferometry for the evaluation of subsidence rates, airborne laser scanning and photogrammetry; Galve et al, 2011; Gutiérrez et al, 2019); (iii) methods that use apparatus in direct contact with the ground surface (e.g., trenching for the precise delimitation of specific sinkholes, ground‐based interferometric measures, high‐precision topographic profiling, Differential Global Navigation Satellite System or Differential Global Positioning System [DGNSS or DGPS], terrestrial laser scanning, measures with tiltmeters; Galve et al, 2011; Gutiérrez et al, 2019); (iv) geomorphological approaches and GIS‐based large‐scale mapping (Cahalan & Milewski, 2018; Nam et al, 2020; Perrin et al, 2015; Zumpano et al, 2019); (v) predictive stability charts developed on the basis of finite or discrete element modelling (FEM or DEM) or laboratory experiments based on equivalent physical models (Al‐Halbouni et al, 2019; Goodings & Abdulla, 2002; Jia et al, 2018; Luu et al, 2019; Perrotti et al, 2019; Xiao et al, 2020).…”