2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydro-geo-chemical streamflow analysis as a support for digital hydrograph filtering in a small, rainfall dominated, sandstone watershed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When water quality data are available through routine sampling campaigns, or dedicated experiments, it can be used to calibrate digital filters. It is recommended that high frequency water quality data are used in a number of sites in the catchment to perform the calibration of digital filters (Longobardi et al, ; Zhang et al, ). Once the filter parameters are calibrated, the entire flow time series can be used to derive a similar time series of baseflow, such as in the study of Zhang et al ().…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When water quality data are available through routine sampling campaigns, or dedicated experiments, it can be used to calibrate digital filters. It is recommended that high frequency water quality data are used in a number of sites in the catchment to perform the calibration of digital filters (Longobardi et al, ; Zhang et al, ). Once the filter parameters are calibrated, the entire flow time series can be used to derive a similar time series of baseflow, such as in the study of Zhang et al ().…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The analysis of water quality data revealed that EC was a suitable tracer to perform hydrograph separation for the Kaap catchment. This is in line with several authors who have used high frequency and discrete time series of EC to perform hydrograph separation and quantify baseflow at a daily timescale (Longobardi et al, ; Miller et al, ; Miller et al, ; Zhang et al, ). For example, Miller et al () used discrete EC data sets to quantify baseflow contributions in the Upper Colorado basin, using hydrograph separation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, following these considerations and in order to overcome the aforementioned issues, Longobardi et al . () proposed an integrated approach, using the mass balance approach to constrain the parameters for the application of the digital recursive filter method on the data from the Ciciriello catchment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Jones et al (2006), Sudicky et al (2007) and Park et al (2011) have considered that the mass balance equations do not adequately account for hydrodynamic dispersion processes that can inflate the groundwater contributions, and they are looking to using the mass balance equation in conjunction with artificial and isotopic tracers or digital filters. Recently, following these considerations and in order to overcome the aforementioned issues, Longobardi et al (2016) proposed an integrated approach, using the mass balance approach to constrain the parameters for the application of the digital recursive filter method on the data from the Ciciriello catchment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each procedure is, to a large extent, arbitrary (Hewelett & Hibbert, ) but provides a repeatable methodology to derive objective measures or indices related to a particular streamflow source. Recursive digital filters (RDFs) are the most commonly used methods for estimating baseflow because of their simplicity and quick implementation, which only needs streamflow data (Aksoy, Kurt, & Eris, ; Eckhardt, ; Li, Maier, Partington, Lambert, & Simmons, ), even though RDF parameters are questionable in certain cases, and geochemical or isotopic method calibration would improve the separation between slow and fast components (Lott & Stewart, ; Longobardi, Villani, Guida, & Cuomo, ). Among RDFs, the Lyne and Hollick method (Ladson, Brown, Neal, & Nathan, ; Lyne & Hollick, ) seemed to be the most flexible approach and to have better performance for a wide range of climate conditions and catchment properties (Li et al, ; Longobardi, Villani, et al, ).…”
Section: Bfi Assessment For Observed Catchmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%